Grok Exposed a Porn Performer's Legal Name and Birthdate–Without Being Asked
1–10 of 49 posts
Re: Grok Exposed a Porn Performer's Legal Name and Birthdate–Without Being Asked
#2If grok knew that it must have been publically available information.
Re: Grok Exposed a Porn Performer's Legal Name and Birthdate–Without Being Asked
#3idk who I can talk about a Facebook Meta Ai which added some sexual features to an influencer for an add for a company x. The company x doesn't wanna talk about and influencer y also doesn't wanna talk about it.
Which makes me think what other things like this has happened with Ai.
Re: Grok Exposed a Porn Performer's Legal Name and Birthdate–Without Being Asked
#4[flagged]
Re: Grok Exposed a Porn Performer's Legal Name and Birthdate–Without Being Asked
#5If grok knew that it must have been publically available information.
Indeed. .
Re: Grok Exposed a Porn Performer's Legal Name and Birthdate–Without Being Asked
#6For Grok’s sake you hope this is data that was public, something that was buried deep that it has surfaced.
It’s a shame transparency is so poor here. A simple grep of the training data would likely give a clear explanation of where this has come from.
Re: Grok Exposed a Porn Performer's Legal Name and Birthdate–Without Being Asked
#7[flagged]
Re: Grok Exposed a Porn Performer's Legal Name and Birthdate–Without Being Asked
#8[deleted]
Re: Grok Exposed a Porn Performer's Legal Name and Birthdate–Without Being Asked
#9[flagged]
In this example the person only asked "who is she what is her name" and it would have been fine to stick with her stage name, as real name and birthdate wasn't asked.