Radio host David Greene says Google's NotebookLM tool stole his voice
1–10 of 99 posts
Re: Radio host David Greene says Google's NotebookLM tool stole his voice
#2Then came the completely nonsensical HN threads with people arguing about something they hadn't heard.
Maybe don't redo that whole thing? Could we at least make sure to secure some examples of A and B, this time?
--
Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice (May 20, 2024)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40421225 (1021 comments)
OpenAI didn’t copy Scarlett Johansson’s voice for ChatGPT, records show (May 23, 2024)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40448045 (1218 comments)
Re: Radio host David Greene says Google's NotebookLM tool stole his voice
#3Re: Radio host David Greene says Google's NotebookLM tool stole his voice
#4Re: Radio host David Greene says Google's NotebookLM tool stole his voice
#5Turns out he still has his own voice, that one sounds like him.
Re: Radio host David Greene says Google's NotebookLM tool stole his voice
#6Re: Radio host David Greene says Google's NotebookLM tool stole his voice
#7Edit, here an older piece, there have been many since: [0], it’s the 3rd voice that enters the NotebookLLM clip so it takes a minute before it comes in (shared this clip here late 2024 [1]).
[0] https://podverse.fm/clip/Vy4y7ZG2Rd
[1] https://hn.algolia.com/?query=NotebookLM%20Copied%20a%20Podc...
Re: Radio host David Greene says Google's NotebookLM tool stole his voice
#8> Greene felt the male voice sounded just like him Turns out he still has his own voice, that one sounds like him.
Re: Radio host David Greene says Google's NotebookLM tool stole his voice
#9Re: Radio host David Greene says Google's NotebookLM tool stole his voice
#10His voice doesn't sound that distinctive to me. He's going to have a hard time unless he can find some emails that say, use David Green's voice.
It doesn't matter whether it sounds distinctive to you. What matters is whether it's close enough to the real person's voice to be an infringement.
Just like it doesn't matter if you used a machine to duplicate a painting. It's still an infringement.
You can't publish a Harry Potter novel and then throw up your hands and say, "It wasn't me. The AI decided to name the characters Hargid and Hermione and Snape."
Google says it paid a voice actor. If it provides proof of that, good. But like with a lot of AI things, we're in new territory here.
Seems like there's a market for a tool that can compare an AI voice to a library of known famous voices so that companies like Google can tweak their machines to not sound too much like someone who can be harmed by a sound-alike.