Live data from Hacker News

Ex-Tech –> Homeless in SF

zamoshi.substack.com

1–10 of 101 posts

Re: Ex-Tech –> Homeless in SF

#5
> A couple months ago, I found that particular bridge was next to an office building inhabited by some of my old colleagues. A start-up I had been a part of in New York. Where I was the first employee. I had owned equity. They had eventually sold for $350 million.

It is depressing easy to have this happen and even worse how many people are convinced it could never be them.

Re: Ex-Tech –> Homeless in SF

#6
> A start-up I had been a part of in New York. Where I was the first employee. I had owned equity. They had eventually sold for $350 million.

What happened to the author's equity?

Re: Ex-Tech –> Homeless in SF

#7
Are people reading this or just up voting the title? Sounds like someone who screwed up their life, likely by being stubborn, and doing a lot of drugs, which doesn't take knowing how to code to pull off. Reads like a love letter to misery by someone who knew they would never be truly affected by it.

Re: Ex-Tech –> Homeless in SF

#9

Are people reading this or just up voting the title? Sounds like someone who screwed up their life, likely by being stubborn, and doing a lot of drugs, which doesn't take knowing how to code to pull off. Reads like a love letter to misery by someone who knew they would never be truly affected by it.

He explicitly writes that he did not do drugs or alcohol.

It would seem like it is some kind of felony charges that are the cause. Whatever they were.

But all in all - the downside risk is huge in the US.

Re: Ex-Tech –> Homeless in SF

#10
Not a worse place to be homeless, except maybe Portland or Seattle.

Obviously more to this story when someones support network has collapsed to this degree, but at the same time people don't have great support networks anymore =/

Post reply on HN