Live data from Hacker News

A web developer posted a payment shaming message on their client's site

joseph-smith.co.uk

1–10 of 115 posts

Re: A web developer posted a payment shaming message on their client's site

#5
I build websites for a living and sometimes people don't pay their bills. Their website going down is usually not a big deal (sometimes they don't notice for months!). But their email, now THAT is a show stopper every time (instant payment).

Re: A web developer posted a payment shaming message on their client's site

#6

As much as I want to side with the developers I think they are exposing themselves to legal repercussions and made their situation worse.

> legal repercussions

like what? contract says "money for stuff". no money, no stuff.

Re: A web developer posted a payment shaming message on their client's site

#8

As much as I want to side with the developers I think they are exposing themselves to legal repercussions and made their situation worse.

It would be interesting to see the project agreement to know if something like this was expressly outlined in it.

My guess is if it was, the client wouldn't agree to it, but who knows (many people just skim over them anyways).

Re: A web developer posted a payment shaming message on their client's site

#9

As much as I want to side with the developers I think they are exposing themselves to legal repercussions and made their situation worse.

In the UK, this is less of a problem, though it depends a lot on the contract between the company and the developer. Assuming nothing exotic, that the statement on the site is true (and not a malicious falsehood) and that if the hosting belongs to the end customer they did not revoke the developer's access (i.e. no unauthorised access occurred), then the developer is in a reasonable position legally. IANAL, of course.

Re: A web developer posted a payment shaming message on their client's site

#10
post #6

As much as I want to side with the developers I think they are exposing themselves to legal repercussions and made their situation worse.

> legal repercussions like what? contract says "money for stuff". no money, no stuff.

> no money, no stuff.

No stuff is one thing. Different stuff deployed to client's url is quite another.

Post reply on HN