AI Police Reports: Year in Review
1–10 of 224 posts
Re: AI Police Reports: Year in Review
#2Re: AI Police Reports: Year in Review
#3That should be 'reining in'. "Reign" is -- ironically - - what monarchs do.
Re: AI Police Reports: Year in Review
#4[flagged]
"You guys"? Everyone is fucked. This is going to be everywhere. Coming to your neighborhood, eventually.
Re: AI Police Reports: Year in Review
#5> important first step in reigning in AI police reports. That should be 'reining in'. "Reign" is -- ironically - - what monarchs do.
Re: AI Police Reports: Year in Review
#6> That means that if an officer is caught lying on the stand – as shown by a contradiction between their courtroom testimony and their earlier police report
The bigger issue, that the article doesn't cover, is that police officers may not carefully review the AI generated report, and then when appearing in court months or years later, will testify to whatever is in the report, accurate or not. So the issue is that the officer doesn't contradict inaccuracies in the report.
Re: AI Police Reports: Year in Review
#7Re: AI Police Reports: Year in Review
#8This does sound problematic, but if a police officer's report contradicts the body-worn camera or other evidence, it already undermines their credibility, whether they blame AI or not. My impression is that police don't usually face repercussions for inaccuracies or outright lying in court. > That means that if an officer is caught lying on the stand – as shown by a contradiction between their courtroom testimony and…
That's because it's a very difficult thing to prove. Bad memories and even completely false memories are real things.
Re: AI Police Reports: Year in Review
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
> You guys are so fucked. "You guys"? Everyone is fucked. This is going to be everywhere. Coming to your neighborhood, eventually.
I dont live in a police state.
I'd be more worried that you aren't reading articles about it than if you were.