Helldivers 2 devs slash install size from 154GB to 23GB
tomshardware.com
Helldivers 2 devs slash install size from 154GB to 23GB
1–10 of 297 posts
Re: Helldivers 2 devs slash install size from 154GB to 23GB
#2Did the duplicated files were even used on pc? Like, do you even have such low access to the file system that you can deduce which duplicated instance has a faster access time on a mechanical hard drive?
Re: Helldivers 2 devs slash install size from 154GB to 23GB
#3Did the duplicated files were even used on pc? Like, do you even have such low access to the file system that you can deduce which duplicated instance has a faster access time on a mechanical hard drive?
Not sure if this is what they did, but you can just put all the things you need together sequentially into a single file and rely on the filesystem to allocate contiguous blocks where possible (using the appropriate size hints to help). It's trivial unpack at loading time without any performance impact.
A filesystem is by itself just one big "file" acting like a file archive.
Re: Helldivers 2 devs slash install size from 154GB to 23GB
#423GB is supposed to be "slim"?!
Re: Helldivers 2 devs slash install size from 154GB to 23GB
#523GB is supposed to be "slim"?!
[dead]
Re: Helldivers 2 devs slash install size from 154GB to 23GB
#623GB is supposed to be "slim"?!
In this day and age it's a gift to only be ~23GB.. I'm reminded of the old days when you literally didn't have the space so had to get creative, now any kind of space optimization isn't even considered.
Re: Helldivers 2 devs slash install size from 154GB to 23GB
#7I've been really curious precisely what changed, and what sort of optimization might have been involved here.
Because offhand, I know you could do things like cute optimizations of redundant data to minimize seek time on optical media, but with HDDs, you get no promises about layout to optimize around...
The only thing I can think of is if it was literally something as inane as checking the "store deduplicated by hash" option in the build, on a tree with copies of assets scattered everywhere, and it was just nobody had ever checked if the fear around the option was based on outcomes.
(I know they said in the original blog post that it was based around fears of client performance impact, but the whole reason I'm staring at that is that if it's just a deduplication table at storage time, the client shouldn't...care? It's not writing to the game data archives, it's just looking stuff up either way...)
Re: Helldivers 2 devs slash install size from 154GB to 23GB
#823GB is supposed to be "slim"?!
Yes. High resolution textures take up a lot of space. Have a look at HD texture mods for skyrim for example. 23GB is more in line with a game from a few years ago, so this really is slim for a modern game with modern graphics.
Re: Helldivers 2 devs slash install size from 154GB to 23GB
#9I did similar work on a game a long time ago and it took over a month to slim it down to 1/4 of the size but in this case 'at runtime' - the producer wasn't impressed. It looked exactly the same. I wonder if they had any pushback.
Re: Helldivers 2 devs slash install size from 154GB to 23GB
#1023GB is supposed to be "slim"?!
Have you played a big budget video game released in the last 10 years? It’s pretty standard to reach upwards of 60GB.