Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
simonwillison.net
Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
1–10 of 116 posts
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#2Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#3Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#4As is usual for NVidia: great hardware, an effing nightmare figuring out how to setup the pile of crap they call software.
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#5As is usual for NVidia: great hardware, an effing nightmare figuring out how to setup the pile of crap they call software.
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#6I'm running VLLM on it now and it was as simple as:
docker run --gpus all -it --rm \
--ipc=host --ulimit memlock=-1 \
--ulimit stack=67108864 \
nvcr.io/nvidia/vllm:25.09-py3
(That recipe from https://catalog.ngc.nvidia.com/orgs/nvidia/containers/vllm?v... )And then in the Docker container:
vllm serve &
vllm chat
The default model it loads is Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B, which is tiny and fast to load.Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#7As is usual for NVidia: great hardware, an effing nightmare figuring out how to setup the pile of crap they call software.
But maybe this will change? Software issues somehow?
It also runs CUDA, which is useful
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#8As is usual for NVidia: great hardware, an effing nightmare figuring out how to setup the pile of crap they call software.
If you think their software is bad try using any other vendor , makes nvidia looks amazing. Apple is only one close
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#9I should be allowed to do stupid things when I want. Give me an override!
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#10As is usual for NVidia: great hardware, an effing nightmare figuring out how to setup the pile of crap they call software.
Except the performance people are seeing is way below expectations. It seems to be slower than an M4. Which kind of defeats the purpose. It was advertised as 1 Petaflop on your desk. But maybe this will change? Software issues somehow? It also runs CUDA, which is useful
plus apparently some of the early benchmarks were made with ollama and should be disregarded