Live data from Hacker News

The AI bubble argument misunderstands both bubbles and AI

danielmiessler.com

1–10 of 64 posts

Re: The AI bubble argument misunderstands both bubbles and AI

#5
I appreciate the author trying to address this. The only issue is the author didn't define what 'pops' in the bubble.

The 'what' that pops, probably, IMHO, is the investment and resources ecosystem dumped, poured, thrown, redirected, etc. to AI.

Just like the .com boom, the costs and money thrown at AI are outsized and will 'pop" as it matures. A 'pop" and leveling down to something perhaps not so outrageous is coming.

As the author states, .com popped but left the Internet still around and expanding. AI is exactly that kind of bubble.

Re: The AI bubble argument misunderstands both bubbles and AI

#9
But if they think the bubble is the idea that "Modern AI will significantly transform business and the global economy, and that it'll lead to massive unemployment for knowledge workers", then—in my opinion—they're just wrong.

AI will one day transform the world but I do not believe modern AI will make that happen, that will have to wait for futuristic AI. I guess that makes AI not a bubble but I can still label modern, i.e. current, AI a bubble, right?

Re: The AI bubble argument misunderstands both bubbles and AI

#10
Better to talk about the Gartner Hype cycle and it's stages compare it to technologies that clearly followed that cycle such as;

- Virtual Reality: big hype in the early 90s (arcades, movies like Lawnmower Man) through to use cases today like surgical training, aviation training

- Mobile video calls: hyped in early 2000's with 3G and pre-iPhone devices. Actually took off with 4G and 5G plus iOS and Android phones

- 3D printing: back in 2013 we were expecting "a 3D printer in every home" ... today valuable in industrial prototyping

Looking back at 2025 we'll be saying "Remember when they said everyone would lose their jobs to AI..."

Post reply on HN