Sequoia backs Zed
zed.dev
Sequoia backs Zed
1–10 of 346 posts
Re: Sequoia backs Zed
#2Seems to solve a real problem which is growing rapidly, both in the old way and in the new way ... if it can overcome _slop_ in LLM chats, and the sheer enormity of code/data ahead. Trying to picture how coherence will survive.
With claims/hype/concern floating around that >90% of code will be LLM-generated within 3-6 months, with the insinuation/tone [1] that the same amount of code will be written by humans as now ( at least at first ) but LLM code will radically grow to dilute the space ( as is happening ) ... seems like DeltaDB being done right/well is going to be do-or-die on whether coherence remains possible!
[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/anthropic-ceo-ai-90-percent-...
Re: Sequoia backs Zed
#3I'd be interested to know how much data DeltaDB accumulates over time - because the level of granularity is so high - and are they going to want to use that data as training data?
Re: Sequoia backs Zed
#4Re: Sequoia backs Zed
#5Re: Sequoia backs Zed
#6Am I the only one that associates "Zed" and "development" with Zed Shaw? I don't think he has anything to do with zed.dev, unfortunately.
Re: Sequoia backs Zed
#7feels like we are giving up privacy for productivity.
Re: Sequoia backs Zed
#8Re: Sequoia backs Zed
#9[flagged]