POML: Prompt Orchestration Markup Language
1–10 of 53 posts
Re: POML: Prompt Orchestration Markup Language
#2[deleted]
Re: POML: Prompt Orchestration Markup Language
#3XML? how is this not just XML with a schema?
Re: POML: Prompt Orchestration Markup Language
#4XML? how is this not just XML with a schema?
Maybe it's not fully XML compliant.
Anyway quite an interesting project, XML's a better fit for "programmable" data.
Re: POML: Prompt Orchestration Markup Language
#5it is concerning that Microsoft didn't provide SDK for its own C#/.Net regarding this new technology, only nodejs and python, which says alot!
Re: POML: Prompt Orchestration Markup Language
#6it is concerning that Microsoft didn't provide SDK for its own C#/.Net regarding this new technology, only nodejs and python, which says alot!
[dead]
Re: POML: Prompt Orchestration Markup Language
#7it is concerning that Microsoft didn't provide SDK for its own C#/.Net regarding this new technology, only nodejs and python, which says alot!
[dead]
Re: POML: Prompt Orchestration Markup Language
#8Re: POML: Prompt Orchestration Markup Language
#9XML? how is this not just XML with a schema?
XML, for those born after 1990, you could have well said COBOL or FORTRAN, something gramps used to mention.
Re: POML: Prompt Orchestration Markup Language
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe it's not fully XML compliant. Anyway quite an interesting project, XML's a better fit for "programmable" data.
It has self-closing tags, which you can see in the repo screenshot, so you're correct.
But why... standards are good, eveyone should have one, I guess.