CCTV footage captures video of an earthquake fault in motion
1–10 of 93 posts
Re: CCTV footage captures video of an earthquake fault in motion
#2Re: CCTV footage captures video of an earthquake fault in motion
#3Re: CCTV footage captures video of an earthquake fault in motion
#4And of course, the earthquake energy source is many magnitudes larger and much, much further away, deep in the crust, with the wavefront already having passed through miles of solid rock. We measure blasts from at most a few hundred meters away.
Re: CCTV footage captures video of an earthquake fault in motion
#5Isn't this news several months old?
Re: CCTV footage captures video of an earthquake fault in motion
#6Re: CCTV footage captures video of an earthquake fault in motion
#7Terrifying. I program automated vibration analysis for blasting, and a very powerful explosive blast will feature particle velocities (the direct corollary for power) in the single-digit in/s range (~0.02-0.13 m/s) . This peak particle velocity is 20-150x higher than the peaks we see from the most powerful blasts we measure, if they're at all qualitatively comparable. And of course, the earthquake energy source is ma…
Re: CCTV footage captures video of an earthquake fault in motion
#8I know nothing so help me here. Why is this so rare? Aren't earthquakes, cameras, and monitoring of them pretty common?
It's the video of the fault line itself fracturing that's so interesting.
We know where the fault lines are, so we generally avoid building anything major near them because... well earthquakes. Hence no other videos of actual fault line fractures (vs general street ones).
Re: CCTV footage captures video of an earthquake fault in motion
#9Terrifying. I program automated vibration analysis for blasting, and a very powerful explosive blast will feature particle velocities (the direct corollary for power) in the single-digit in/s range (~0.02-0.13 m/s) . This peak particle velocity is 20-150x higher than the peaks we see from the most powerful blasts we measure, if they're at all qualitatively comparable. And of course, the earthquake energy source is ma…
in/s? Inches per second, or something else? One inch per second is the speed of an excited snail.