Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI claims gold-medal performance at IMO 2025

twitter.com

1–10 of 737 posts

Re: OpenAI claims gold-medal performance at IMO 2025

#4
Progress is astounding. Recently report published about evaluation of LLMs on IMO 2025. o3 high didn't even get bronze.

https://matharena.ai/imo/

Waiting for Terry Tao's thoughts, but these kind of things are good use of AI. We need to make science progress faster rather than disrupting our economy without being ready.

Re: OpenAI claims gold-medal performance at IMO 2025

#7

Progress is astounding. Recently report published about evaluation of LLMs on IMO 2025. o3 high didn't even get bronze. https://matharena.ai/imo/ Waiting for Terry Tao's thoughts, but these kind of things are good use of AI. We need to make science progress faster rather than disrupting our economy without being ready.

[flagged]

Re: OpenAI claims gold-medal performance at IMO 2025

#9
Some previous predictions:

In 2021 Paul Christiano wrote he would update from 30% to "50% chance of hard takeoff" if we saw an IMO gold by 2025.

He thought there was an 8% chance of this happening.

Eliezer Yudkowsky said "at least 16%".

Source:

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/sWLLdG6DWJEy3CH7n/imo-challe...

Re: OpenAI claims gold-medal performance at IMO 2025

#10
post #3

huh? any details?

[flagged]

Which would be impressive if we knew those problems weren't in the training data already.

I mean it is quite impressive how language models are able to mobilize the knowledge they have been trained on, especially since they are able to retrieve information from sources that may be formatted very differently, with completely different problem statement sentences, different variable names and so on, and really operate at the conceptual level.

But we must wary of mixing up smart information retrieval with reasoning.

Post reply on HN