We accidentally solved robotics by watching 1M hours of YouTube
ksagar.bearblog.dev
We accidentally solved robotics by watching 1M hours of YouTube
1–10 of 183 posts
Re: We accidentally solved robotics by watching 1M hours of YouTube
#2Does YouTube allow massive scraping like this in their ToS?
Re: We accidentally solved robotics by watching 1M hours of YouTube
#3Friendly unit conversion man at your service: 114 years.
Re: We accidentally solved robotics by watching 1M hours of YouTube
#4Friendly unit conversion man at your service: 114 years.
How much is that in football fields?
Re: We accidentally solved robotics by watching 1M hours of YouTube
#5Does YouTube allow massive scraping like this in their ToS?
What ToS
Re: We accidentally solved robotics by watching 1M hours of YouTube
#6Does YouTube allow massive scraping like this in their ToS?
Probably not.
Who cares at this point? No one is stopping ML sets from being primarily pirated. The current power is effectively dismantling copyright for AI related work.
Re: We accidentally solved robotics by watching 1M hours of YouTube
#7Does YouTube allow massive scraping like this in their ToS?
They don't and neither do I allow my site - whose content I found on Gemini -scraped
Re: We accidentally solved robotics by watching 1M hours of YouTube
#8This is interesting for generalized problems ("make me a sandwich") but not useful for most real world functions ("perform x within y space at z cost/speed"). I think the number of people on the humanoid bandwagon trying to implement generalized applications is staggering right now. The physics tells you they will never be as fast as purpose-built devices, nor as small, nor as cheap. That's not to say there's zero value there, but really we're - uh - grasping at straws...
Re: We accidentally solved robotics by watching 1M hours of YouTube
#9Does YouTube allow massive scraping like this in their ToS?
I don't think they can legally prevent it
Re: We accidentally solved robotics by watching 1M hours of YouTube
#10This is interesting for generalized problems ( "make me a sandwich" ) but not useful for most real world functions ( "perform x within y space at z cost/speed" ). I think the number of people on the humanoid bandwagon trying to implement generalized applications is staggering right now. The physics tells you they will never be as fast as purpose-built devices, nor as small, nor as cheap. That's not to say there's zer…
I wonder if a generalized machine would have an advantage from scale, and then putting all the specialized stuff into software. We have seen this play out before.