A new PNG spec
programmax.net
A new PNG spec
1–10 of 622 posts
Re: A new PNG spec
#2Re: A new PNG spec
#3This worries me. Because presumably, changing the compression algorithm will break backwards compatibility, which means we'll start to see "png" files that aren't actually png files.
It'll be like USB-C but for images.
Re: A new PNG spec
#4Re: A new PNG spec
#5Curious if Animated SVGs are also a thing. I remember seeing some Javascript based SVG animations (it was a animated chatbot avatar) - but not sure if there is any standard framework.
Re: A new PNG spec
#6> I know you all immediately wondered, better compression?. We're already working on that. This worries me. Because presumably, changing the compression algorithm will break backwards compatibility, which means we'll start to see "png" files that aren't actually png files. It'll be like USB-C but for images.
That being said, they also can do dumb things however, right at the end of the sentence you quote they say:
> we want to make sure we do it right.
So there's hope.
Re: A new PNG spec
#7> I know you all immediately wondered, better compression?. We're already working on that. This worries me. Because presumably, changing the compression algorithm will break backwards compatibility, which means we'll start to see "png" files that aren't actually png files. It'll be like USB-C but for images.
[1] https://github.com/w3c/png/issues/39#issuecomment-2674690324
Re: A new PNG spec
#8So animated GIFs can be replaced by Animated PNGs with alpha blending with transparent backgrounds and lossless compression! Some nostalgia from 2000s websites can be revived and relived :) Curious if Animated SVGs are also a thing. I remember seeing some Javascript based SVG animations (it was a animated chatbot avatar) - but not sure if there is any standard framework.
Yes. Relevant animation elements:
•
•
•
•
Re: A new PNG spec
#9Re: A new PNG spec
#10Probably the best news here. While you already can write custom data into a header, having Exif is good.
BTW: Does Exif have a magnetometer (rotation) and acceleration (gravity) field? I often wonder about why Google isn't saving this information in the images which the camera app saves. It could help so much with post-processing, like with leveling the horizon or creating panoramas.