Live data from Hacker News

Harper – an open-source alternative to Grammarly

writewithharper.com

1–10 of 167 posts

Re: Harper – an open-source alternative to Grammarly

#6
This seems to use a hard coded list of explicit rules, not an LLM

https://writewithharper.com/docs/rules

https://github.com/Automattic/harper/blob/0c04291bfec25d0e93...

        "PointIsMoot" => (
            ["your point is mute"],
            ["your point is moot"],
            "Did you mean `your point is moot`?",
            "Typo: `moot` (meaning debatable) is correct rather than `mute`."
        ),

Re: Harper – an open-source alternative to Grammarly

#9

This seems to use a hard coded list of explicit rules, not an LLM https://writewithharper.com/docs/rules https://github.com/Automattic/harper/blob/0c04291bfec25d0e93... "PointIsMoot" => ( ["your point is mute"], ["your point is moot"], "Did you mean `your point is moot`?", "Typo: `moot` (meaning debatable) is correct rather than `mute`." ),

From a quick look phrase corrections is just one type of rule. There are many other rules, some are dynamic like when to use "your" vs "you're", oxford commas, etc.

That it doesn't use LLMs is its advantage, it runs in under 10ms and can be easily embedded in software and still provide useful grammar checking even if it's not exhaustive

Re: Harper – an open-source alternative to Grammarly

#10
IMO not using LLMs is a big plus in my book. Grammarly has been going downhill since they've been larding it with "AI features," it has become remarkably inconsistent. It will tell me to remove a comma one hour, and then tell me to add it back the next.
Post reply on HN