Live data from Hacker News

How Instagram Could Have Cut a Better Deal

dealbook.nytimes.com

1–10 of 50 posts

Re: How Instagram Could Have Cut a Better Deal

#3
This was a well known fact from the get go. TechCrunch on May 17th:

http://techcrunch.com/2012/05/17/facebooks-38-share-price-ma...

> When Facebook agreed to buy Instagram, it said it would pay with $300 million in cash and 22,999,412 shares of stock. That stock is now worth nearly $874 million, creating a $1.17 billion price tag.

Re: How Instagram Could Have Cut a Better Deal

#4
post #2

TL;DR 300m + 700m in Facebook shares in April (much less today) was careless and very very very very veryvery shitty deal, for a service with no revenue, albeit hot. So learn from this.

Instagram will go down as being a shitty deal for both sides. An arranged marriage, as it were.

Re: How Instagram Could Have Cut a Better Deal

#6
post #4
post #2

TL;DR 300m + 700m in Facebook shares in April (much less today) was careless and very very very very veryvery shitty deal, for a service with no revenue, albeit hot. So learn from this.

Instagram will go down as being a shitty deal for both sides. An arranged marriage, as it were.

Why do you think this will end up being a shitty deal for Instagram?

Re: How Instagram Could Have Cut a Better Deal

#8
post #6
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Instagram will go down as being a shitty deal for both sides. An arranged marriage, as it were.

Why do you think this will end up being a shitty deal for Instagram?

My guess would be the ever-declining value of FB stock.

Re: How Instagram Could Have Cut a Better Deal

#9
post #8
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why do you think this will end up being a shitty deal for Instagram?

My guess would be the ever-declining value of FB stock.

I assume they sold it right away, though I guess there's no way to know.
Post reply on HN