Live data from Hacker News

Gemma 3 QAT Models: Bringing AI to Consumer GPUs

developers.googleblog.com

1–10 of 286 posts

Re: Gemma 3 QAT Models: Bringing AI to Consumer GPUs

#5
First graph is a comparison of the "Elo Score" while using "native" BF16 precision in various models, second graph is comparing VRAM usage between native BF16 precision and their QAT models, but since this method is about doing quantization while also maintaining quality, isn't the obvious graph of comparing the quality between BF16 and QAT missing? The text doesn't seem to talk about it either, yet it's basically the topic of the blog post.

Re: Gemma 3 QAT Models: Bringing AI to Consumer GPUs

#8
post #2

Available on ollama: https://ollama.com/library/gemma3

How many times do I have to say this? Ollama, llamacpp, and many other projects are slower than vLLM/sglang. vLLM is a much superior inference engine and is fully supported by the only LLM frontends that matter (sillytavern).

The community getting obsessed with Ollama has done huge damage to the field, as it's ineffecient compared to vLLM. Many people can get far more tok/s than they think they could if only they knew the right tools.

Re: Gemma 3 QAT Models: Bringing AI to Consumer GPUs

#10
?

Am I missing something?

These have been out for a while; if you follow the HF link you can see, for example, the 27b quant has been downloaded from HF 64,000 times over the last 10 days.

Is there something more to this, or is just a follow up blog post?

(is it just that ollama finally has partial (no images right?) support? Or something else?)

Post reply on HN