Repealing the CHIPS Act risks US national security
1–10 of 64 posts
Re: Repealing the CHIPS Act risks US national security
#2Re: Repealing the CHIPS Act risks US national security
#3Re: Repealing the CHIPS Act risks US national security
#4Paywalled, so how did it go to the frontpage if most people can't read it?
By reading the headline
Re: Repealing the CHIPS Act risks US national security
#5Paywalled, so how did it go to the frontpage if most people can't read it?
Re: Repealing the CHIPS Act risks US national security
#6Re: Repealing the CHIPS Act risks US national security
#7Paywalled, so how did it go to the frontpage if most people can't read it?
Some of us also have FT subscriptions though.
That'd be an interesting poll. What % of HN readers (poll participants) subscribe to the big paywalled story sources? NYT, FT, The Economist, ...
Re: Repealing the CHIPS Act risks US national security
#8Just cancel it, make a new Act with a different name and equal purpose, claim victory. Seems to be the most likely procedure with the current administration.
"It was a disaster, but We Fixed It because I'm your favorite."
Re: Repealing the CHIPS Act risks US national security
#9Just cancel it, make a new Act with a different name and equal purpose, claim victory. Seems to be the most likely procedure with the current administration.
For example?
Also please show that the major current on-going efforts, like ongoing negotiations, measures in the border etc, were worked upon as intensive as it is now, in the previous administration.