Vanguard's average fee is now 0.07% after biggest-ever cut
1–10 of 279 posts
Re: Vanguard's average fee is now 0.07% after biggest-ever cut
#2Re: Vanguard's average fee is now 0.07% after biggest-ever cut
#3Fidelity used to be known for actively managed funds, but has been eating Vanguard's indexing lunch for the past 10 years or so. Part of this relates to its dominance in workplace accounts, but Vanguard hasn't helped itself with some bad customer-facing software updates and a perception that its service levels are poor compared to Fidelity.
Cutting fees helps, but Fidelity has shown its willing to do this, too, including no fee "Zero" index funds: https://www.fidelity.com/mutual-funds/investing-ideas/index-... (note Fidelity is very clear about who it's competing with)
Re: Vanguard's average fee is now 0.07% after biggest-ever cut
#4Not mentioned in any of the coverage I've seen (or the interview with Vanguard's new CEO in the WSJ) is Fidelity. Fidelity used to be known for actively managed funds, but has been eating Vanguard's indexing lunch for the past 10 years or so. Part of this relates to its dominance in workplace accounts, but Vanguard hasn't helped itself with some bad customer-facing software updates and a perception that its service l…
Re: Vanguard's average fee is now 0.07% after biggest-ever cut
#5Not mentioned in any of the coverage I've seen (or the interview with Vanguard's new CEO in the WSJ) is Fidelity. Fidelity used to be known for actively managed funds, but has been eating Vanguard's indexing lunch for the past 10 years or so. Part of this relates to its dominance in workplace accounts, but Vanguard hasn't helped itself with some bad customer-facing software updates and a perception that its service l…
Re: Vanguard's average fee is now 0.07% after biggest-ever cut
#6Not mentioned in any of the coverage I've seen (or the interview with Vanguard's new CEO in the WSJ) is Fidelity. Fidelity used to be known for actively managed funds, but has been eating Vanguard's indexing lunch for the past 10 years or so. Part of this relates to its dominance in workplace accounts, but Vanguard hasn't helped itself with some bad customer-facing software updates and a perception that its service l…
Re: Vanguard's average fee is now 0.07% after biggest-ever cut
#7Not mentioned in any of the coverage I've seen (or the interview with Vanguard's new CEO in the WSJ) is Fidelity. Fidelity used to be known for actively managed funds, but has been eating Vanguard's indexing lunch for the past 10 years or so. Part of this relates to its dominance in workplace accounts, but Vanguard hasn't helped itself with some bad customer-facing software updates and a perception that its service l…
Of course, I'm a 'buy and hold' investor so this doesn't really effect me much, but it's the principle of the matter.
Re: Vanguard's average fee is now 0.07% after biggest-ever cut
#8Anyone know off the top of their heads which funds specifically? Thinking I need to move away from being so stock-heavy.
Re: Vanguard's average fee is now 0.07% after biggest-ever cut
#9Re: Vanguard's average fee is now 0.07% after biggest-ever cut
#10Article mentions their bond funds getting the most dramatic cuts — they didn't list specific symbols though. Anyone know off the top of their heads which funds specifically? Thinking I need to move away from being so stock-heavy.