Live data from Hacker News

Cheap rj45 ethernet to USB adapter contains malware

twitter.com

1–10 of 26 posts

Re: Cheap rj45 ethernet to USB adapter contains malware

#5
post #2

Seems light on details. How is it executing the payload? Is it doing something like badusb where it emulates a keyboard to run the payload? Wouldn't that be super obvious? Or is it something as simple as telling the user to install a "driver"?

From the replies it sounds like it mounted as a storage device and ran autorun. It was super obvious which is what caused them to take notice.

Re: Cheap rj45 ethernet to USB adapter contains malware

#6
post #2

Seems light on details. How is it executing the payload? Is it doing something like badusb where it emulates a keyboard to run the payload? Wouldn't that be super obvious? Or is it something as simple as telling the user to install a "driver"?

From the replies it sounds like it mounted as a storage device and ran autorun. It was super obvious which is what caused them to take notice.

Please tell me Windows doesn't STILL autorun off of external drives? I thought that was solved years ago...

Re: Cheap rj45 ethernet to USB adapter contains malware

#7
It's worth noting that there's basically zero proper evidence that there is any malware included with this device -- it runs an exe when inserted, but that exe appears, at a glance, to be a driver installer. Definitely not the right way to do things, but there's a difference between "incompetent" and "malicious".

The only actual "evidence" that was provided was a link to a falcon sandbox run, something which actually requires human analysis to draw conclusions about -- and anyone who has ever used it knows how many false positives it finds.

A better proclamation might be "cheap network adapter comes with an auto-running executable which needs further analysis".

Re: Cheap rj45 ethernet to USB adapter contains malware

#8
post #2

Seems light on details. How is it executing the payload? Is it doing something like badusb where it emulates a keyboard to run the payload? Wouldn't that be super obvious? Or is it something as simple as telling the user to install a "driver"?

From the replies it sounds like it mounted as a storage device and ran autorun. It was super obvious which is what caused them to take notice.

Autorun has been disabled since the release of Windows 7 in 2009.

Re: Cheap rj45 ethernet to USB adapter contains malware

#9
post #2

Seems light on details. How is it executing the payload? Is it doing something like badusb where it emulates a keyboard to run the payload? Wouldn't that be super obvious? Or is it something as simple as telling the user to install a "driver"?

The dongle enumerates as a USB hub with two USB devices plugged into it. One is an ethernet dongle, which is the sort of hardware that may require a driver. The second device is a USB flash drive containing a .exe, which extracts a file called Setup.exe. It won't execute unless the user manually executes it - it's just a USB drive after all. Maybe the .exe contains malware, maybe it doesn't. Maybe antivirus scans give false positives. Maybe the manufacturer found a clever way to save money by combining the two USB devices they normally shipped together. Maybe this twitter account just made a nice paycheck from clickbait engagement.

Re: Cheap rj45 ethernet to USB adapter contains malware

#10
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From the replies it sounds like it mounted as a storage device and ran autorun. It was super obvious which is what caused them to take notice.

Autorun has been disabled since the release of Windows 7 in 2009.

For what it's worth, I just checked on my windows 11 install and it was (somewhat) enabled.

Settings -> Bluetooth & Devices -> AutoPlay -> Use AutoPlay for all media and devices

Was set to on, and "Removable drive" was set to "Choose a default", which appears to be equivalent to "Ask me every time".

I don't have anything (that I'm aware of) that auto-runs something, but I presume it will prompt me asking if I want to run setup.exe, which seems somewhat reasonable for new hardware.

And from the malware analysis, https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/e3f57d5ebc882a0a0ca96... , it's signed by "Owner: CN=Microsoft Windows Hardware Compatibility Publisher, O=Microsoft Corporation, L=Redmond, ST=Washington, C=US; Issuer: CN=Microsoft Windows Third Party Component CA 2012, O=Microsoft Corporation, L=Redmond, ST=Washington, C=US" which also looks pretty legit.

I can totally see a lot of folks allowing it to run.

Post reply on HN