Live data from Hacker News

After a 24-second test of its engines, the New Glenn rocket is ready to fly

arstechnica.com

1–10 of 148 posts

Re: After a 24-second test of its engines, the New Glenn rocket is ready to fly

#2
We're at 12 years of design and 5 years behind the originally announced first launch of 2020 now. Space is hard, rocketry is harder and I wish them luck, but Blue Origin has an awfully long way to go if they want to catch up to SpaceX: this was meant to be the Falcon 9 killer, but odds are Starship will be fully operational before New Glenn completes testing.

Re: After a 24-second test of its engines, the New Glenn rocket is ready to fly

#3

We're at 12 years of design and 5 years behind the originally announced first launch of 2020 now. Space is hard, rocketry is harder and I wish them luck, but Blue Origin has an awfully long way to go if they want to catch up to SpaceX: this was meant to be the Falcon 9 killer, but odds are Starship will be fully operational before New Glenn completes testing.

[flagged]

Re: After a 24-second test of its engines, the New Glenn rocket is ready to fly

#4

We're at 12 years of design and 5 years behind the originally announced first launch of 2020 now. Space is hard, rocketry is harder and I wish them luck, but Blue Origin has an awfully long way to go if they want to catch up to SpaceX: this was meant to be the Falcon 9 killer, but odds are Starship will be fully operational before New Glenn completes testing.

Starship will serve a different mission profile. People seem convinced Starship will just "solve" space, but if it works, there's still going to be demand for other mission profiles that it won't make sense to send on Starship.

But if your point wasn't to say that it will be obsoleted by Starship, and just to say instead it's slower development than Starship, yeah, that's true.

I suspect the head start in infrastructure spacex has is pretty valuable in developing new programs.

Space is hard. I hope Blue Origin succeeds.

Re: After a 24-second test of its engines, the New Glenn rocket is ready to fly

#5
I'm a big SpaceX fan, nonetheless I am looking forward to some competition for SpaceX. If New Glenn succeeds, it might become a workhorse like Falcon 9/Heavy. And don't forget New Armstrong is the next generation, should be in the works.

Re: After a 24-second test of its engines, the New Glenn rocket is ready to fly

#6

I'm a big SpaceX fan, nonetheless I am looking forward to some competition for SpaceX. If New Glenn succeeds, it might become a workhorse like Falcon 9/Heavy. And don't forget New Armstrong is the next generation, should be in the works.

I'm sure that as the new pseudo-president he will avoid doing anything that might sabotage SpaceX competitors.

Re: After a 24-second test of its engines, the New Glenn rocket is ready to fly

#7

We're at 12 years of design and 5 years behind the originally announced first launch of 2020 now. Space is hard, rocketry is harder and I wish them luck, but Blue Origin has an awfully long way to go if they want to catch up to SpaceX: this was meant to be the Falcon 9 killer, but odds are Starship will be fully operational before New Glenn completes testing.

Do you have some references of New Glenn being positioned as a Falcon 9 killer by any industry professionals, commentators or press with credibility (at the risk of no true Scotsman)?

This was certainly thrown around with Tesla, but it's not something I've personally come across with SpaceX.

Regardless, if semiconductors have taught us anything over the last decade, strong competition is essential for a healthy market. It's hard to imagine a true (haha) fan of space exploration that isn't cheering on Rocket Lab and Blue Origin (as you are), even if they're destined to forever be runners up. Even if you believe Musk will operate SpaceX entirely selflessly, he won't be in control of it forever.

Re: After a 24-second test of its engines, the New Glenn rocket is ready to fly

#8
How much data do you guys reckon they gather during this 24-second window? Gigabytes? Terabytes? I imagine they have redundant sensors for every measurement, if possible. The LHC generates 1 PB/s, though it filters it down to roughly 200MB/s[0]. I wonder how this compares.

0: https://www.lhc-closer.es/taking_a_closer_look_at_lhc/0.lhc_...

Re: After a 24-second test of its engines, the New Glenn rocket is ready to fly

#9

We're at 12 years of design and 5 years behind the originally announced first launch of 2020 now. Space is hard, rocketry is harder and I wish them luck, but Blue Origin has an awfully long way to go if they want to catch up to SpaceX: this was meant to be the Falcon 9 killer, but odds are Starship will be fully operational before New Glenn completes testing.

> Blue Origin has an awfully long way to go if they want to catch up to SpaceX

Maybe we should just give the whole space industry to SpaceX because obviously nobody can touch them. /s

Re: After a 24-second test of its engines, the New Glenn rocket is ready to fly

#10

We're at 12 years of design and 5 years behind the originally announced first launch of 2020 now. Space is hard, rocketry is harder and I wish them luck, but Blue Origin has an awfully long way to go if they want to catch up to SpaceX: this was meant to be the Falcon 9 killer, but odds are Starship will be fully operational before New Glenn completes testing.

Starship will serve a different mission profile. People seem convinced Starship will just "solve" space, but if it works, there's still going to be demand for other mission profiles that it won't make sense to send on Starship. But if your point wasn't to say that it will be obsoleted by Starship, and just to say instead it's slower development than Starship, yeah, that's true. I suspect the head start in infrastruct…

Which mission profiles does Starship not make sense for?
Post reply on HN