DeepSeek-V3
github.com
DeepSeek-V3
1–10 of 44 posts
Re: DeepSeek-V3
#2The benchmark results seem unrealistically good, but I'm not sure from which angles I should challenge them.
Re: DeepSeek-V3
#3You can run a model that can beat 4o which was released less than 6 months ago _locally_! I know this requires a ton of hardware but OpenAI will not be the leader in 2025 I can assume. Always bet on open source (or rather somewhat more open development strategies)
The math and coding performance is what we really care about. I am paying for o1 Pro and also Sonnet, in my experience beside Sonnet being faster, it is also better at many tasks. In a few instances I got answers from o1 Pro but it's not justifying the price so I am cancelling and going back to $20/mo.
I am currently paying for Cursor, Claude, ChatGPT and v0! The productivity I am gaining from those tools are totally worth it (except for o1 Pro). But I am really hoping at some point those tools converge so I can pay less. For instance I am looking forward to VSCode Copilot improvements so I can go back to VSCode and once Claude has no limits I rather pay for one AI system.
Re: DeepSeek-V3
#4The results look quite promising.i will give this a try...
Re: DeepSeek-V3
#5The benchmark results seem unrealistically good, but I'm not sure from which angles I should challenge them.
I think they're real. The model is performing better than claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 on the claude leaderboard:
Re: DeepSeek-V3
#6Someone pointed out on Reddit that DeekSeek v3 is 53x cheaper to inference than Claude Sonnet which it trades blows with in the benchmarks. As we saw with o3, compute cost to hit a certain benchmark score will become an important number now that we are in the era that you can throw an arbitrary amount of test time compute to hit an arbitrary benchmark number.
https://old.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1hmm8v9/psa_dee...
Re: DeepSeek-V3
#7[deleted]
Re: DeepSeek-V3
#8You can run a model that can beat 4o which was released less than 6 months ago _locally_! I know this requires a ton of hardware but OpenAI will not be the leader in 2025 I can assume. Always bet on open source (or rather somewhat more open development strategies) The math and coding performance is what we really care about. I am paying for o1 Pro and also Sonnet, in my experience beside Sonnet being faster, it is al…
OpenAi toppled as LLM leader by an open source / open weight company?
OpenAi has much more capital and compute than any of its competitors (especially deepseek); if that was to happen it would demonstrate that capital and compute doesn't matter as much as it is assumed ... (and it just might be the thing that pops the current ai bubble).
Re: DeepSeek-V3
#9You can run a model that can beat 4o which was released less than 6 months ago _locally_! I know this requires a ton of hardware but OpenAI will not be the leader in 2025 I can assume. Always bet on open source (or rather somewhat more open development strategies) The math and coding performance is what we really care about. I am paying for o1 Pro and also Sonnet, in my experience beside Sonnet being faster, it is al…
well yes, locally, if you assume that someone's got about 300'000 dollars of hardware at hand... right?
as you are not paying for Gemini, may I ask why, did you try it and find it inferior?
Re: DeepSeek-V3
#10You can run a model that can beat 4o which was released less than 6 months ago _locally_! I know this requires a ton of hardware but OpenAI will not be the leader in 2025 I can assume. Always bet on open source (or rather somewhat more open development strategies) The math and coding performance is what we really care about. I am paying for o1 Pro and also Sonnet, in my experience beside Sonnet being faster, it is al…
well yes, locally, if you assume that someone's got about 300'000 dollars of hardware at hand... right? as you are not paying for Gemini, may I ask why, did you try it and find it inferior?
Gemini for coding does not work for me. It gets so many things wrong