GitHub Copilot is now available for free
github.com
GitHub Copilot is now available for free
1–10 of 412 posts
Re: GitHub Copilot is now available for free
#2Includes up to 2,000 completions and 50 chat requests per month.
Re: GitHub Copilot is now available for free
#3Has anyone compared the updated Copilot with Cursor? The main updates I am wondering about are model selection and multi-file edits. I used copilot before these features, changed to Cursor and now I am wondering how much Copilot has closed the gap.
Re: GitHub Copilot is now available for free
#4Includes up to 2,000 completions and 50 chat requests per month.
So basically it’s free for 1 day per month (I only use chat).
Re: GitHub Copilot is now available for free
#5I ditched Copilot for Cursor and never looked back. Cursor might be the only other AI product with product market fit than ChatGPT, it's that good
Re: GitHub Copilot is now available for free
#6I actually closed by Github account because I don't want to support AI or have my code trained on AI. Now I'm extra happy I shut it down.
Re: GitHub Copilot is now available for free
#7This is great as an entry point to programming and also good for startups.
and with the recent addition to o1 in Cursor the price of a mid-senior is set to around $20.
It has been a while since my business needed to hire more senior engineers for a while, I only needed around 1 or 2 and the rest as interns using Copilot or Cursor.
This is a great time to build projects and get into programming for everyone.
Re: GitHub Copilot is now available for free
#8That free plan sounds too limited for continuous use. Is this the sort of plan that will convert non-users into paying customers?
Compared to other paid plans for various AI services, this one seems like it's relatively the most enticing.
Re: GitHub Copilot is now available for free
#9[flagged]
Re: GitHub Copilot is now available for free
#10I actually closed by Github account because I don't want to support AI or have my code trained on AI. Now I'm extra happy I shut it down.
> I don't want to support AI or have my code trained on AI.
What are your arguments for this?