Implementing a simple object system from scratch in Ruby
metacircu1ar.github.io
Implementing a simple object system from scratch in Ruby
1–10 of 11 posts
Re: Implementing a simple object system from scratch in Ruby
#2Re: Implementing a simple object system from scratch in Ruby
#3Interesting. Why the inconsistent use of hash rockets?
Re: Implementing a simple object system from scratch in Ruby
#4Interesting. Why the inconsistent use of hash rockets?
Thanks for spotting this. The parts of code were written at different times. I'll fix this to standardize on :key => value form, as I want symbols to be clearly distinguishable both on call sites and in the method table.
Re: Implementing a simple object system from scratch in Ruby
#5Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for spotting this. The parts of code were written at different times. I'll fix this to standardize on :key => value form, as I want symbols to be clearly distinguishable both on call sites and in the method table.
Not that it necessarily applies here but any time I see hash rockets in a PR it just screams “an llm wrote this”
Re: Implementing a simple object system from scratch in Ruby
#6it might not be the fastest or the strictest, but man is it expressive
Re: Implementing a simple object system from scratch in Ruby
#7Ruby really is a powerful language it might not be the fastest or the strictest, but man is it expressive
[0] tested locally on a Linux environment
Re: Implementing a simple object system from scratch in Ruby
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not that it necessarily applies here but any time I see hash rockets in a PR it just screams “an llm wrote this”
I write some ruby code for my job to automate some API testing stuff, where I use hash rockets exclusively.
Re: Implementing a simple object system from scratch in Ruby
#9Re: Implementing a simple object system from scratch in Ruby
#10Ruby really is a powerful language it might not be the fastest or the strictest, but man is it expressive
You are correct technically, but the implication that you must sacrifice speed or static typing is practically incorrect: faster on startup than .NET [0]. You can get benefits similar to static typing in for a while now [1]. [0] tested locally on a Linux environment [1] https://github.com/ruby/rbs#readme
This is unlikely. When you invoke 'dotnet run' you're essentially going through the entire build system, it doesn't "just" launch the application - it also builds it or verifies that it doesn't need to.
The actual startup time for compiled applications is Feel free to verify this with:
dotnet new console --aot
dotnet publish -o .
hyperfine ./{name of the program}
(make sure to use up-to-date version of the SDK, can be installed with sudo apt install dotnet9 / brew install dotnet)Of course performance of the code itself is going to have more than an order of magnitude of difference: https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/...