Live data from Hacker News

Kagi Translate

blog.kagi.com

1–10 of 119 posts

Re: Kagi Translate

#2
>Quality ratings based on internal testing and user feedback

I'd be interested in knowing more about the methodology here. People who use Kagi tend to love Kagi, so bias would certainly get in the way if not controlled for. How rigorous was the quality-rating process? How big of a difference is there between "Average", "High" and "Very High"?

I'm also curious to the 1 additional language that Kagi supports (Google is listed at 243, Kagi at 244)?

>Kagi Translate is free for everyone.

That's nice!

Re: Kagi Translate

#4
Has anyone seen info on how this works? "It’s not revolutionary" seems like an understatement when you can do better then DeepL and support more languages then google?

Re: Kagi Translate

#5
Kudos in the launch! Looking good!

One benefit of Google Translate is with languages like Hebrew and Arabic, you can enter in those languages phonetically or with on-screen keyboards.

Re: Kagi Translate

#7
Disclaimer: I am already a Kagi customer.

At least for Afrikaans I'm not impressed here. There are some inaccuracies, like "varktone" becoming "pork rinds" instead of "pig toes" and also some censorship ("jou ma se poes" does NOT mean "play with my cat"!). Comparing directly against Google Translate, Google nails everything I threw at it.

I didn't see any option to provide feedback, suggested translations, etc, but I'm hopeful that this service improves.

Re: Kagi Translate

#8
post #6

> Limitations > We do not translate dynamically created content ... What does that mean?

I would guess it's only able to translate the html content sent on page load - so static webpages, but not SPAs etc.

Re: Kagi Translate

#10
post #6

> Limitations > We do not translate dynamically created content ... What does that mean?

I assume it means they only translate what's in the HTML, not anything that's added via Javascript later.
Post reply on HN