Live data from Hacker News

Gorhill pulls uBlock Origin Lite from Firefox store

neowin.net

1–10 of 442 posts

Re: Gorhill pulls uBlock Origin Lite from Firefox store

#5
I really hope Raymond Hill won't do the same for uBlock Origin (the manifest v2 version). I'm not too comfortable recommending others to install a self-hosted extension.

It's a shame Mozilla and Raymond Hill can't/won't solve this together. I get that the review he got simply should not have happened for an extension like this (see the Github thread¹) and that he is simply done with bothering, but I worry about how that will affect uBlock Origin's long-term stability as a project. The whole situation sounds decidedly unhealthy.

1: https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/issues/197#issueco...

Re: Gorhill pulls uBlock Origin Lite from Firefox store

#7
Because no one ever have taken over and compromised high profile extensions?

Chrome battles with it a lot, see eg. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36146278

I find Mozilla's process to be quite reassuring, but would be good to have alternative "addon stores" that also have a review process

Re: Gorhill pulls uBlock Origin Lite from Firefox store

#8
>The last message from the developer in a now-closed GitHub issue shows an email from Mozilla admitting its fault and apologizing for the mistake. However, Raymond still pulled the extension from the Mozilla Add-ons Store, which means you can no longer find it on addons.mozilla.org.

This seems pretty harsh. Mozilla made a mistake, Mozilla apologized, Mozilla fixed the mistake (maybe even improved their processes), and the author still pulls their choose and criticizes Mozilla. On my opinion either author took this a bit up personally, or cares about improving the review process and wants to make a strong point (with some hurt done for their project visibility).

Post reply on HN