Matt Mullenweg insinuates using "WordPress" in hosting plans infringes trademark
1–4 of 4 posts
Re: Matt Mullenweg insinuates using "WordPress" in hosting plans infringes trademark
#2Seems this is part of a bigger thing where he laid in to WP Engine during a conference presentation for contributing what he sees as a disproportionately small amount of time to the Wordpress community, which he says is because WP Engine is owned by Private Equity investors Silver Lake.
Starts about the minutes into this video:
Re: Matt Mullenweg insinuates using "WordPress" in hosting plans infringes trademark
#3Seems this is part of a bigger thing where he laid in to WP Engine during a conference presentation for contributing what he sees as a disproportionately small amount of time to the Wordpress community, which he says is because WP Engine is owned by Private Equity investors Silver Lake. Starts about the minutes into this video: https://youtu.be/fnI-QcVSwMU?t=596
WordPress is ubiquitous. That's an uncontentious statement. When your open source software literally runs a double digit percent of the internet, complaining about how much contribution you get from anyone is really just whining: WP Engine competes with WordPress.com and they're clearly doing well enough to exceed what Automattic puts out for some customers.
Any attempts to introduce nuance around "WordPress hosting" versus "hosting for WordPress" or whatever legally acceptable phrasing satisfies the legal requirements will hurt far more little guys than WP Engine, and stunt the future growth of WordPress as a project. WordPress isn't enterprise software that you buy support contracts for, like ElasticSearch or Mongo. At this point, other than just making noise on Twitter, the only effect any of this will have is putting people off from using WordPress.
Re: Matt Mullenweg insinuates using "WordPress" in hosting plans infringes trademark
#4[deleted]