Say No to the Paywall of PCI-E Bifurcation
1–10 of 29 posts
Re: Say No to the Paywall of PCI-E Bifurcation
#2For a NAS I don't need 4 in a pool, just 2 per slot works fine with HDD backups.
Re: Say No to the Paywall of PCI-E Bifurcation
#3So basically, it’s an argument to make all computers more expensive, in order to subsidize hobbyists.
Re: Say No to the Paywall of PCI-E Bifurcation
#4More config options means more to test and support, so more cost. The manufacturers who are buying lower end motherboards/chipsets at scale don’t need the feature. And virtually no consumer installs a PCI-E device, ever. So basically, it’s an argument to make all computers more expensive, in order to subsidize hobbyists.
They're not a selling point, even for the enthusiasts who buy individual motherboards.
You'd think that that by now, the chipset vendors would provide a reference Coreboot image for each new platform, (which, since it would be more or less for debugging purposes, would have MAX OPTIONS) and then the motherboard manufacturers would do the bare minimum to cut off any features not relevant to their boards or swap in modules for whichever small technical deltas-- different audio chipsets or clock generators-- they actually make underneath the garish silkscreen and RGB strips.
Re: Say No to the Paywall of PCI-E Bifurcation
#5More config options means more to test and support, so more cost. The manufacturers who are buying lower end motherboards/chipsets at scale don’t need the feature. And virtually no consumer installs a PCI-E device, ever. So basically, it’s an argument to make all computers more expensive, in order to subsidize hobbyists.
I'm sort of amazed these days that we still have commercial BIOSes (well, UEFIs) They're not a selling point, even for the enthusiasts who buy individual motherboards. You'd think that that by now, the chipset vendors would provide a reference Coreboot image for each new platform, (which, since it would be more or less for debugging purposes, would have MAX OPTIONS) and then the motherboard manufacturers would do the…
Re: Say No to the Paywall of PCI-E Bifurcation
#6More config options means more to test and support, so more cost. The manufacturers who are buying lower end motherboards/chipsets at scale don’t need the feature. And virtually no consumer installs a PCI-E device, ever. So basically, it’s an argument to make all computers more expensive, in order to subsidize hobbyists.
Re: Say No to the Paywall of PCI-E Bifurcation
#7More config options means more to test and support, so more cost. The manufacturers who are buying lower end motherboards/chipsets at scale don’t need the feature. And virtually no consumer installs a PCI-E device, ever. So basically, it’s an argument to make all computers more expensive, in order to subsidize hobbyists.
Same-slot bifurcation controlled by the BIOS requires basically zero additional testing. If it works on one board, it's pretty much guaranteed to work on another. After all, it's nothing more than a feature flag toggle.
They have already invested the money into developing the software feature, because some boards do have bifurcation. So why isn't it available on on all enthusiast-level boards? Or even worse, why are they spending extra time and energy into disabling it on cheap motherboards?
Re: Say No to the Paywall of PCI-E Bifurcation
#8Looking at asus's 4x nvme bifurcation card you cannot use an igpu enabled processor and maintain 4x4 with any CPU. I don't want to fill a slot with a dedicated GPU. For a NAS I don't need 4 in a pool, just 2 per slot works fine with HDD backups.
The budget Ryzen 8000 CPUs are indeed quite limited, which is a shame if you wanted to go for an 8000G APU to use its powerful iGPU for transcoding.
Re: Say No to the Paywall of PCI-E Bifurcation
#9More config options means more to test and support, so more cost. The manufacturers who are buying lower end motherboards/chipsets at scale don’t need the feature. And virtually no consumer installs a PCI-E device, ever. So basically, it’s an argument to make all computers more expensive, in order to subsidize hobbyists.
I'm sort of amazed these days that we still have commercial BIOSes (well, UEFIs) They're not a selling point, even for the enthusiasts who buy individual motherboards. You'd think that that by now, the chipset vendors would provide a reference Coreboot image for each new platform, (which, since it would be more or less for debugging purposes, would have MAX OPTIONS) and then the motherboard manufacturers would do the…
They could hire people to do the work for them, but that'd require finding and vetting people with the necessary skills without the knowledge of how to do so. As long as BIOS manufacturers can sell their services for cheaper than setting up an extra firmware department, they'll do good business.