Live data from Hacker News

GPT-fabricated scientific papers on Google Scholar

misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu

1–10 of 107 posts

Re: GPT-fabricated scientific papers on Google Scholar

#3
post #2

I appreciate that, appropriately, the article image is not AI-generated.

I was able to get pretty close with chatgpt: https://rr.judge.sh/Commabutterfly/76b34e/nmwguWGt8pIe.jpg

> create a picture of scrabble pieces strewn on a table, with a closeup of a line of scrabble letters spelling "CHATGPT" on top of them. photographic, realistic quality, maintain realism and believability

Re: GPT-fabricated scientific papers on Google Scholar

#4
post #2

I appreciate that, appropriately, the article image is not AI-generated.

I was able to get pretty close with chatgpt: https://rr.judge.sh/Commabutterfly/76b34e/nmwguWGt8pIe.jpg > create a picture of scrabble pieces strewn on a table, with a closeup of a line of scrabble letters spelling "CHATGPT" on top of them. photographic, realistic quality, maintain realism and believability

I prefer yours. Better lighting.

Re: GPT-fabricated scientific papers on Google Scholar

#5
GPT might make fabricating scientific papers easier, but let's not forget how many humans fabricated scientific research in recent years - they did a great job without AI!

For any who haven't seen/heard, this makes for some entertaining and eye-opening viewing!

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=academic+fraud

Re: GPT-fabricated scientific papers on Google Scholar

#6
There is article shows no evidence of fabrication, fraud or misinformation, while making accusations of all of them. All it shows is that ChatGPT was used, which is wildly escalated into "evidence manipulation" (ironically without evidence).

Much more work is needed to show that this means anything.

Re: GPT-fabricated scientific papers on Google Scholar

#8
post #2

I appreciate that, appropriately, the article image is not AI-generated.

I was able to get pretty close with chatgpt: https://rr.judge.sh/Commabutterfly/76b34e/nmwguWGt8pIe.jpg > create a picture of scrabble pieces strewn on a table, with a closeup of a line of scrabble letters spelling "CHATGPT" on top of them. photographic, realistic quality, maintain realism and believability

You can get much better results with Ideogram 2 (also free):

https://ideogram.ai/assets/image/lossless/response/vF81gKjHS...

https://ideogram.ai/assets/image/lossless/response/EcRpDLumS...

Almost the same prompt.

Re: GPT-fabricated scientific papers on Google Scholar

#9
> Two main risks arise... First, the abundance of fabricated “studies” seeping into all areas of the research infrastructure... A second risk lies in the increased possibility that convincingly scientific-looking content was in fact deceitfully created with AI tools...

A third risk: ChatGPT has no understanding of "truth" in the sense of facts reported by established, trusted sources. I'm doing a research project related to use of data lakes and tried using ChatGPT to search for original sources. It's a shitshow of fabricated links and pedestrian summaries of marketing materials.

This feels like an evolutionary dead end.

Re: GPT-fabricated scientific papers on Google Scholar

#10
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was able to get pretty close with chatgpt: https://rr.judge.sh/Commabutterfly/76b34e/nmwguWGt8pIe.jpg > create a picture of scrabble pieces strewn on a table, with a closeup of a line of scrabble letters spelling "CHATGPT" on top of them. photographic, realistic quality, maintain realism and believability

You can get much better results with Ideogram 2 (also free): https://ideogram.ai/assets/image/lossless/response/vF81gKjHS... https://ideogram.ai/assets/image/lossless/response/EcRpDLumS... Almost the same prompt.

Great tip. The text handling here is far superior.
Post reply on HN