Starlink Defies Order to Block X in Brazil
nytimes.com
Starlink Defies Order to Block X in Brazil
1–10 of 207 posts
Re: Starlink Defies Order to Block X in Brazil
#2Is this a principled defense of free speech or a case of a man treating ostensibly independent companies as divisions of his personal conglomerate?
Re: Starlink Defies Order to Block X in Brazil
#3[flagged]
Re: Starlink Defies Order to Block X in Brazil
#4[flagged]
Ever hear about the Kessler effect?
Re: Starlink Defies Order to Block X in Brazil
#5Is this a principled defense of free speech or a case of a man treating ostensibly independent companies as divisions of his personal conglomerate?
The only speech this man wants to be free is his own.
Re: Starlink Defies Order to Block X in Brazil
#6X is turning into a wasteland of angry people and bots. Bluesky is much more refreshing, similar to the old twitter.
Re: Starlink Defies Order to Block X in Brazil
#7Re: Starlink Defies Order to Block X in Brazil
#8Just how important are the ground stations in Brazil? (I don't mean the end user terminals.)
If Starlink will basically continue to work well enough if those are seized, it seems like the obvious next steps are going to be crypto/stablecoin payments and a focus on small form factor terminals like Starlink Mini that can bypass customs.
Re: Starlink Defies Order to Block X in Brazil
#9Is this a principled defense of free speech or a case of a man treating ostensibly independent companies as divisions of his personal conglomerate?
I think it’s probably both.
Re: Starlink Defies Order to Block X in Brazil
#10Is this a principled defense of free speech or a case of a man treating ostensibly independent companies as divisions of his personal conglomerate?
It's one thing leading to the other. It is what it is.
Are the judge's (possibly illegal) moves motivated by interpretation of the law or by personal vendetta?
Hard to tell , but i'm glad for less censorship.