0xCAFEBABE & 0xFEEDFACE (2003)
radio-weblogs.com
0xCAFEBABE & 0xFEEDFACE (2003)
1–10 of 126 posts
Re: 0xCAFEBABE & 0xFEEDFACE (2003)
#2Rust will yell at you if you use specific magic numbers like these
edit: yes, 0xCAFEBABE is a warning but 0xFEEDFACE is not:
3405691582
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d0ea1d767925d53b2230e...
Re: 0xCAFEBABE & 0xFEEDFACE (2003)
#3Rust will yell at you if you use specific magic numbers like these edit: yes, 0xCAFEBABE is a warning but 0xFEEDFACE is not: 3405691582 https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d0ea1d767925d53b2230e...
that sounds like 0xBADDBEEF
Re: 0xCAFEBABE & 0xFEEDFACE (2003)
#40xDDDB00B5
Re: 0xCAFEBABE & 0xFEEDFACE (2003)
#5I'm surprised they didn't use 0xDECAFBAD for the Java format.
Even more interesting is the Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexspeak catalogs a delightfully long list of hexspeak words and what they're used for.
Re: 0xCAFEBABE & 0xFEEDFACE (2003)
#6Re: 0xCAFEBABE & 0xFEEDFACE (2003)
#70x08675309 also shows up fairly often.
Re: 0xCAFEBABE & 0xFEEDFACE (2003)
#8Rust will yell at you if you use specific magic numbers like these edit: yes, 0xCAFEBABE is a warning but 0xFEEDFACE is not: 3405691582 https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d0ea1d767925d53b2230e...
0xB16B00B5
Re: 0xCAFEBABE & 0xFEEDFACE (2003)
#90xDDDB00B5
That's a Code of Conduct violation. It's not the 90s anymore, there's no quarter for this type of thing in modern development teams. Rust's style checker even flags up the use problematic magic numbers.
Re: 0xCAFEBABE & 0xFEEDFACE (2003)
#10= CAECBA8E