Live data from Hacker News

The Soul of Maintaining a New Machine

books.worksinprogress.co

1–10 of 49 posts

Re: The Soul of Maintaining a New Machine

#2
I'd forgotten how close to printing machines the old photocopiers were. You would basically either have a crap one you could operate yourself, or take your stuff to the printery to have professionals (a subset of librarians I think, or the logical join over librarians and computer operations staff) do it for you. Printing machines had a fleet of maintainers, craft unions who walked off the job if you touched a dial.

They were amazing at doing things which really mattered: shrinking an A0 architectural drawing down but maintaining aspect ratio. Adjusting offsets for the print for binding signatures, so the 1st and 16th page was not too far out because of wrapping around the other 8 pairs of pages. Even just working out how to rotate the pages for N-up printing. But the GUI sucked. I think they called ours "the bindery" because it's main gig was doing PHD from soup to nuts, binding included.

The repair techs had the most amazing flight cases, packed with tools which served one specific purpose.Like, A doohickey to adjust the corona wire, without dismantling the imaging and toner roller, with a tonne of equipment hovering over your head on a gas-lift. Screwdrivers with very very carefully chosen lengths. Torque wrenches. It was high tech meets motor racing meets.. IBM.

I am told they were paid better than many computer techs. The IBM guy was paid IBM scale to fix it on IBMs timescales. the xerox guy did more random shit, with more devices, more often.

They had a very corporate look. that amazing briefcase or six. Suit, tie. Very acceptable.

I know a guy who worked for a paper-folding-and-envelope-stuffing company and it was very similar culturally: can-do, fix anything, but working on giant multi-million dollar machines which were used twice a year to do tax mailouts, and election materials, and the rest of the time rented to the original spam merchants for 10c per thousand mailouts. The secondhand value of these machines were like photocopiers: Really significant. He was brought out of retirement to help take one apart into TEU equivalent chunks to be shipped to Singapore from Brisbane. His retirement gig at one point was repairing Espresso machines, he said it made him feel familiar and useful.

The era which was the end of the typing pool was fascinating. All kinds of arcane roles which only make sense in the absence of email and tiny printers everywhere. Some of those jobs had been there from the days of hand-copying, Dickens-era and before.

Re: The Soul of Maintaining a New Machine

#3
post #2

I'd forgotten how close to printing machines the old photocopiers were. You would basically either have a crap one you could operate yourself, or take your stuff to the printery to have professionals (a subset of librarians I think, or the logical join over librarians and computer operations staff) do it for you. Printing machines had a fleet of maintainers, craft unions who walked off the job if you touched a dial.…

Back in my mainframe days (late 70s) we ran a large mainframe, the only one in the local uni - way slower than your phone, a couple of Mb of core, ran payroll and 30 terminals. We had a dedicated local engineer who had his own onsite office. In the south of NZ we were a really long long way away from his home office in the US, he was expected to be able to fix anything, and mostly he could.

But one time the machine started writing crap on random things - screens, printers, worst of all disks - could take a day or to to recover after it scribbled across the equivalent of the root file system (giant head-per-track coffee table sized platters). The poor engineers couldn't figure it out, it happened so in frequently eventually they flew a guy out from head office in the US - he came with a wooden stick - he ran it down a card cagore in the IO process, nothing happened, he tried the next row bang! it crashed, after we were back up he continued with his wooden stick doing a binary search for the source, eventually he pulled a card and 3 little solder balls fell into his hand, they'd been sitting there loose against IC pins since it was installed

As you point out sometimes it just takes having the correct tool and knowing how to use it

Re: The Soul of Maintaining a New Machine

#4
post #2

I'd forgotten how close to printing machines the old photocopiers were. You would basically either have a crap one you could operate yourself, or take your stuff to the printery to have professionals (a subset of librarians I think, or the logical join over librarians and computer operations staff) do it for you. Printing machines had a fleet of maintainers, craft unions who walked off the job if you touched a dial.…

We still have an old printing machine. It came as part of an acquisition and took a truck to move. We rent a small unit in an industrial complex to house it.

Nobody knows how old it is. It predated the folk who came with it (all of whom were close to retirement.)

It's still running (looked after by one of the retirees on a part time basis.) He does print runs a couple times a week. To seem him with an oil can in his hands is to step back in time.

It's more or less neutral profit-wise, but pays his wage and keeps some old customers happy. When he gives up the machine goes too (likely for scrap I guess).

Re: The Soul of Maintaining a New Machine

#6
post #4
post #2

I'd forgotten how close to printing machines the old photocopiers were. You would basically either have a crap one you could operate yourself, or take your stuff to the printery to have professionals (a subset of librarians I think, or the logical join over librarians and computer operations staff) do it for you. Printing machines had a fleet of maintainers, craft unions who walked off the job if you touched a dial.…

We still have an old printing machine. It came as part of an acquisition and took a truck to move. We rent a small unit in an industrial complex to house it. Nobody knows how old it is. It predated the folk who came with it (all of whom were close to retirement.) It's still running (looked after by one of the retirees on a part time basis.) He does print runs a couple times a week. To seem him with an oil can in his…

Beautiful little story. I love when such things are allowed to exist.

Re: The Soul of Maintaining a New Machine

#8
post #5

Reference - a great read - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Soul_of_a_New_Machine

Good share. Haven't read but looking at the wiki entry it's an interesting book, Technology requires a culture to sustain it.

To use a fancy word there's a "noosphere" around that carries knowledge and lore along with it.

Plus the usual kind of Deming wisdom about real knowledge organisation:

    "in many ways opposite of traditional management...innovations are
    started at the grassroots level.", and "people will give their best
    when the work itself is challenging and rewarding."
That atmosphere is still around in engineering teams in smaller companies where there's a good range of advancement within engineering and some stable products so there's a stream of old-timers and apprentices building and exchanging chops.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noosphere

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Edwards_Deming

Re: The Soul of Maintaining a New Machine

#9
I while ago (around 2010) I worked at Océ Technologies R&D and at least to me the machines while incredibly complex where quite easy to operate and maintain. In fact every developer was allowed to print their private stuff (non commercial) on the machines under development. I believe this really helped because we basically had to become operators and maintainers and got a feel of their roles. If you print something for yourself, family or friends you also take a better look at the output or sometimes have a very specific use case in mind.

Re: The Soul of Maintaining a New Machine

#10
This goes a long way in explaining the incredibly warm and sociable, yet undeniably peculiar Xerox tech that I would interact with on a regular basis. Despite him not actually working for the company, I would have to call him in constantly to get him to fix one or more of the machines we had in the office.
Post reply on HN