Live data from Hacker News

Xpra: Persistent Remote Applications for X11

github.com

1–10 of 142 posts

Re: Xpra: Persistent Remote Applications for X11

#5
post #2

The description makes me think this can reproduce a cool workflow demonstration I saw a few years ago on reddit[1]. [1]: https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/k1eu0n/durden_wor...

You could probably tweak something like Barrier for the kvm/cursor move, and use XPRA to move the window, sure. No idea how much/little work it'd be but doesn't seem like it should be all that complex.

Re: Xpra: Persistent Remote Applications for X11

#7

Okay, but X11 is deprecated. Is there a modern version?

I don't think the existence of Wayland means X11 is deprecated. Lots of people (including myself) would prefer the perfectly working X11 than the feature-incomplete backward-incompatible "modern" wayland

Re: Xpra: Persistent Remote Applications for X11

#9
post #7

Okay, but X11 is deprecated. Is there a modern version?

I don't think the existence of Wayland means X11 is deprecated. Lots of people (including myself) would prefer the perfectly working X11 than the feature-incomplete backward-incompatible "modern" wayland

I haven't yet seen any compelling reason to move off of X11. It's been years since I've checked - what's the current state of the art ?

Re: Xpra: Persistent Remote Applications for X11

#10
post #7

Okay, but X11 is deprecated. Is there a modern version?

I don't think the existence of Wayland means X11 is deprecated. Lots of people (including myself) would prefer the perfectly working X11 than the feature-incomplete backward-incompatible "modern" wayland

It's deprecated by the people who wrote it, and AFAIK no-one else has taken up the task of maintaining it. Doesn't mean you can't use it (I still use it still, thanks to said breakage), but it's not exactly thriving.
Post reply on HN