Underwater acoustic analysis reveals unique pressure signals – Revisiting MH370
1–10 of 23 posts
Re: Underwater acoustic analysis reveals unique pressure signals – Revisiting MH370
#2[deleted]
Re: Underwater acoustic analysis reveals unique pressure signals – Revisiting MH370
#3This was a suprisingly approachable and enjoyable read for a layman.
Thanks for posting!
Re: Underwater acoustic analysis reveals unique pressure signals – Revisiting MH370
#4its silly that someone who solo-publishes a paper still needs to refer to themselves as "we"
cool paper
Re: Underwater acoustic analysis reveals unique pressure signals – Revisiting MH370
#5its silly that someone who solo-publishes a paper still needs to refer to themselves as "we" cool paper
I think it's fun when I'm writing documents.
Re: Underwater acoustic analysis reveals unique pressure signals – Revisiting MH370
#6its silly that someone who solo-publishes a paper still needs to refer to themselves as "we" cool paper
Me, myself, and I.
Re: Underwater acoustic analysis reveals unique pressure signals – Revisiting MH370
#7Re: Underwater acoustic analysis reveals unique pressure signals – Revisiting MH370
#8its silly that someone who solo-publishes a paper still needs to refer to themselves as "we" cool paper
I usually interpret the “we” in scientific papers as “you (the reader) and me (the author)”.
Re: Underwater acoustic analysis reveals unique pressure signals – Revisiting MH370
#9its silly that someone who solo-publishes a paper still needs to refer to themselves as "we" cool paper
The Royal “we”.
Re: Underwater acoustic analysis reveals unique pressure signals – Revisiting MH370
#10its silly that someone who solo-publishes a paper still needs to refer to themselves as "we" cool paper
It is silly. The guy may just want to avoid standing out or drawing attention to themselves. "I" is more appropriate for any solo paper. If the author really can't bring themselves to write "I", then they should just avoid the first-person entirely.
(Or maybe this is a field-specific thing. This guy is in a math dept, and I can only speak from the perspective of the social sciences)