Binius: Highly efficient proofs over binary fields
vitalik.eth.link
Binius: Highly efficient proofs over binary fields
1–10 of 25 posts
Re: Binius: Highly efficient proofs over binary fields
#2Re: Binius: Highly efficient proofs over binary fields
#3https://reddit.com/r/math/comments/tc7lur/computing_square_r...
Re: Binius: Highly efficient proofs over binary fields
#4Re: Binius: Highly efficient proofs over binary fields
#5Re: Binius: Highly efficient proofs over binary fields
#6Re: Binius: Highly efficient proofs over binary fields
#7> Square root is expensive https://reddit.com/r/math/comments/tc7lur/computing_square_r...
Re: Binius: Highly efficient proofs over binary fields
#8> Square root is expensive https://reddit.com/r/math/comments/tc7lur/computing_square_r...
Re: Binius: Highly efficient proofs over binary fields
#9[flagged]
Re: Binius: Highly efficient proofs over binary fields
#10> To stop this, we sample r from an extension field. For example, you can define y where y ^ 3 = 5, and take combinations of 1, y and y ^ 2 .
This reads like trying to increase entropy without adding entropy. Given the analogy of bruteforcing a low entropy preimage in a hash, Concatenating the secret preimage with itself, or adding capitalization on the second occurence etc. does not increase entropy, its just a constant factor in computational complexity which both attacker and defender suffer.
I am probably misunderstanding what's written, but I suspect its due to the unclear exposition...