Amazon owes $525M in cloud-storage patent fight, US jury says
1–10 of 222 posts
Re: Amazon owes $525M in cloud-storage patent fight, US jury says
#2Seems like they are patent trolling to me. Hope Amazon wins the appeal. Nightmare for their corporate counsel to have to walk a jury through this and just hope for the best
Re: Amazon owes $525M in cloud-storage patent fight, US jury says
#3Can someone please ELI5: What tech did the patent cover?
Re: Amazon owes $525M in cloud-storage patent fight, US jury says
#4Kove owns three data storage patents that it alleges AWS has infringed: U.S. Patent No. 7,103,640 (the '640 Patent), entitled "Network Distributed Tracking Wire Transfer Protocol"; U.S. Patent No. 7,814,170 (the '170 Patent), entitled "Network Distributed Tracking Wire Transfer Protocol"; and U.S. Patent No. 7,233,978 (the '978 Patent), entitled "Method and Apparatus for Managing Location Information in a Network Separate From the Data to Which the Location Information Pertains."
Re: Amazon owes $525M in cloud-storage patent fight, US jury says
#5Links to two of the patents that were infringed
https://patents.google.com/patent/US7103640B1/en
https://patents.google.com/patent/US7233978B2/en
I really hope Kove loses, I don't know too much about networking, but a few header fields don't really seem patentworthy to me.
Re: Amazon owes $525M in cloud-storage patent fight, US jury says
#6lol this is an insane ruling, there’s no way this will actually happen.
Re: Amazon owes $525M in cloud-storage patent fight, US jury says
#7Can someone please ELI5: What tech did the patent cover?
.
Re: Amazon owes $525M in cloud-storage patent fight, US jury says
#8Can someone please ELI5: What tech did the patent cover?
prior art basically.
Re: Amazon owes $525M in cloud-storage patent fight, US jury says
#9Re: Amazon owes $525M in cloud-storage patent fight, US jury says
#10I looked up the first of the patents. Here's its PDF:
https://ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/7...
I'm not a patent lawyer, just a programmer, but reading just the abstract, this seems to be covering a DNS system that can be configured via an API, which I guess does cover S3, but also, like, almost every other domain-related thing?