Chrome Enterprise Premium: The future of endpoint security
cloud.google.com
Chrome Enterprise Premium: The future of endpoint security
1–10 of 12 posts
Re: Chrome Enterprise Premium: The future of endpoint security
#2Does this compete directly with Island? And what does the Google offering give that Island doesn’t and vice versa?
Re: Chrome Enterprise Premium: The future of endpoint security
#3I am really surprised they don't have a full blown EDR/EPP solution yet. From the title I thought that would be what this is about but from the content it doesn't look like it.
Re: Chrome Enterprise Premium: The future of endpoint security
#4Google acting like they just invented Group Policy, which turns 25 this year.
I don't want Google as my anti-malware vendor thank you. The reason half these security problems exist is because Chrome is so bloated.
IE seems simple and efficient by comparison.
Re: Chrome Enterprise Premium: The future of endpoint security
#5I am really surprised they don't have a full blown EDR/EPP solution yet. From the title I thought that would be what this is about but from the content it doesn't look like it.
It seems like it'd be a logical step, especially after their Mandiant acquisition in late 2022 (various security services/threat intelligence). Maybe they would seek to acquire this capability as well.
Re: Chrome Enterprise Premium: The future of endpoint security
#6Paying a subscription for a browser? We desperately need more browser agents supported/developed by “not a Big Tech Corp”
Re: Chrome Enterprise Premium: The future of endpoint security
#7Paying a subscription for a browser? We desperately need more browser agents supported/developed by “not a Big Tech Corp”
No, paying a subscription for a browser add on that boosts enterprise security.
I too would love more browsers from non-behemoths but I don’t think this particular example is a great argument for it.
Re: Chrome Enterprise Premium: The future of endpoint security
#8Paying a subscription for a browser? We desperately need more browser agents supported/developed by “not a Big Tech Corp”
No, paying a subscription for a browser add on that boosts enterprise security. I too would love more browsers from non-behemoths but I don’t think this particular example is a great argument for it.
I think The Register articulates quite well why it’s a bad idea and honestly it’s high time we consider that ad/AI companies can’t also be browser makers.
https://www.theregister.com/2024/04/10/chrome_enterprise_pre...
Re: Chrome Enterprise Premium: The future of endpoint security
#9That's quite a lot of corporate fluff to announce 4 bullet points.
Re: Chrome Enterprise Premium: The future of endpoint security
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, paying a subscription for a browser add on that boosts enterprise security. I too would love more browsers from non-behemoths but I don’t think this particular example is a great argument for it.
I think The Register articulates quite well why it’s a bad idea and honestly it’s high time we consider that ad/AI companies can’t also be browser makers. https://www.theregister.com/2024/04/10/chrome_enterprise_pre...
While criticism of Google (or FAANG is valid), the issue is these type of articles is that they write these are bad ideas but never propose a viable replacement that just works. In addition, they TheRegister
- has Google Ads
- has prominent AI promoting articles