Live data from Hacker News

On the Double-Slit Experiment and Quantum Interference in the Wolfram Model (2020)

wolframphysics.org

1–10 of 58 posts

Re: On the Double-Slit Experiment and Quantum Interference in the Wolfram Model (2020)

#4

[flagged]

No need for crank. It’s wolfram. Hiding behind some accolades of past, lawsuits and other tangibly criminal offenses. The guy is smart enough To gear projects to ends that avoid crank threshold in the dictionary definition.

Re: On the Double-Slit Experiment and Quantum Interference in the Wolfram Model (2020)

#5

[flagged]

I’m sure it can fit basically any phenomenon, including an elephant wiggling its trunk. I too would like to see some actual predictions coming out of the model, but either way, I don’t begrudge him the effort. I’d like to believe what underlies our reality is more elegant than the high level mishmash we currently understand.

Re: On the Double-Slit Experiment and Quantum Interference in the Wolfram Model (2020)

#6

[flagged]

That's not the kind of model it is. The standard model is one example of a quantum field theory. You should think of Wolfram's idea as a different formalism (ie. not QFT), not a different example. It so happens that Wolfram's multiway model (allegedly, I can't evaluate it fairly for myself) also contains GR as a low-energy limit.

It's like inventing a new operating system (we currently have 3ish, Newtonian, Quantum, and GR) instead of writing a new program (baseball, orbital motion, chemistry, gravitational waves, etc.) Perhaps new programs can be written on this new OS that couldn't be written before. If known programs cannot run on this new OS then it is defective.

Re: On the Double-Slit Experiment and Quantum Interference in the Wolfram Model (2020)

#9
Mindscape episode with Stephen Wolfram from 2021 which might also be of interest. I enjoyed it even if most of it was way over my head. It is probably overly-ambitious and probably a dead end but it's an worthy attempt (if you have the money) and he's definitely not a crank. Eccentric maybe though.

https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2021/07/12/155-...

Re: On the Double-Slit Experiment and Quantum Interference in the Wolfram Model (2020)

#10

[flagged]

I can imagine you snubbing Hamilton by going all "can the least action principle explain a single phenomenon not already explained by the forces + newton's laws? Thought not. Crank".

I have no idea what worfram's model is about, and I agree that the language he uses to publicise it is kinda twatty. However your insane criterion for what constitutes a theory/formalism worth exploring is clearly guided by your bias against the man.

Post reply on HN