Live data from Hacker News

Neural Network Diffusion

arxiv.org

1–10 of 92 posts

Re: Neural Network Diffusion

#6
post #5
post #2

Author thread: https://twitter.com/liuzhuang1234/status/1760195922502312197

Is there any sites for viewing Twitter threads without signing up?

https://nitter.esmailelbob.xyz/liuzhuang1234/status/17601959...

(bit of trial and error from https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/wiki/Instances)

Re: Neural Network Diffusion

#7
post #4

Seems like we're getting very close to recursive self-improvement [0]. [0] https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/recursive-self-improvement

I upvoted because this was my first thought too, but reading the abstract and skimming the paper makes me think it’s not really an advance for general recursive improvement. I think the title makes people think this is a text -> model model, when it is really a bunch of model weights -> new model weights optimizer for a specific architecture and problem. Still a potentially very useful idea for learning from a bunch of training runs and very interesting work!

Re: Neural Network Diffusion

#10
post #4

Seems like we're getting very close to recursive self-improvement [0]. [0] https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/recursive-self-improvement

Doesn't look that different from what we are already doing. For example AlphaGo/AlphaZero/MuZero learn to play board games by playing repeatedly against itself, it is a self improvement loop leading to superhuman play. It was a major breakthrough for the game of Go, and it lead to advances in the field of machine learning, but we are still far from something resembling technological singularity.

GANs are another example of self-improvement. It was famous for creating "deep fakes". It works by pitting a fake generator and a fake detector against each other, resulting in a cycle of improvement. It didn't get much further than that, in fact, it is all about attention and transformers now.

This is just a way of optimizing parameters, it will not invent new techniques. It can say "put 1000 neurons there, 2000 there, etc...", but it still has to pick from what designers tell it to pick from. It may adjust these parameters better than a human can, leading to more efficient systems, I expect some improvement to existing systems, but not a breaking change.

Post reply on HN