Disrupting malicious uses of AI by state-affiliated threat actors
1–10 of 94 posts
Re: Disrupting malicious uses of AI by state-affiliated threat actors
#2Curious how they managed to associate which account/queries belong to which actor/group.
Re: Disrupting malicious uses of AI by state-affiliated threat actors
#3You'd think the smart thing to do would be to let them use it, see what they're doing and subtly mess with the results.
Re: Disrupting malicious uses of AI by state-affiliated threat actors
#4When I look at the list of things they did, they seem to be largely research of the open literature. Am I missing something?
Re: Disrupting malicious uses of AI by state-affiliated threat actors
#5You'd think the smart thing to do would be to let them use it, see what they're doing and subtly mess with the results.
That's probably what happened. OpenAI should already have a big chunk of data.
Re: Disrupting malicious uses of AI by state-affiliated threat actors
#6Fuck openai, I'm a security researcher and if you dare ask it about anything Windows related it tells you to screw off. Linux? Fine. But ask about some undocumented Windows behavior and it says it can't. Ask it about patchguard internals as a reference? Tells you it can't assist. Absolutely crazy, I can understand asking it to write straight up malware, oh wait, it does that no issue! Lord help you if you want to use it as a reference or educational tool...
Re: Disrupting malicious uses of AI by state-affiliated threat actors
#7Fuck openai, I'm a security researcher and if you dare ask it about anything Windows related it tells you to screw off. Linux? Fine. But ask about some undocumented Windows behavior and it says it can't. Ask it about patchguard internals as a reference? Tells you it can't assist. Absolutely crazy, I can understand asking it to write straight up malware, oh wait, it does that no issue! Lord help you if you want to use…
I don't get your attitude. This is not public service.
Re: Disrupting malicious uses of AI by state-affiliated threat actors
#8Much of the alleged "malicious uses" seem to only be malicious because of who the actors are. How dare they translate published technical papers!
Re: Disrupting malicious uses of AI by state-affiliated threat actors
#9What this tells me is that if you think you have any privacy with OpenAI by turning off chat history in ChatGPT or exercising your California or EU privacy rights, you are kidding yourself. In the name of national security, anything you send to OpenAI can be used against you.
Re: Disrupting malicious uses of AI by state-affiliated threat actors
#10Looking over the specifics, the striking thing about this to me is that it seems like these supposedly-sophisticated covert operatives are just going to ChatGPT (or similar) and basically asking "how do I make good malware?"