Brazil Hits 92% Renewable Energy Milestone
old.reddit.com
Brazil Hits 92% Renewable Energy Milestone
1–10 of 41 posts
Re: Brazil Hits 92% Renewable Energy Milestone
#2Also solve the deforestation problem for good, otherwise Brazil will shoot its own feet by causing deforestation-induced droughts to decrease available hydropower.
Re: Brazil Hits 92% Renewable Energy Milestone
#3Most of it is hydropower. But most good hydropower sites are already tapped, so we shouldn't expect this source growth to keep pace in the future. So, to keep these numbers good, it's necessary to crank up the deployment of solar panels and wind turbines a lot. Also solve the deforestation problem for good, otherwise Brazil will shoot its own feet by causing deforestation-induced droughts to decrease available hydrop…
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7046-hydroelectric-po...
Re: Brazil Hits 92% Renewable Energy Milestone
#4Most of it is hydropower. But most good hydropower sites are already tapped, so we shouldn't expect this source growth to keep pace in the future. So, to keep these numbers good, it's necessary to crank up the deployment of solar panels and wind turbines a lot. Also solve the deforestation problem for good, otherwise Brazil will shoot its own feet by causing deforestation-induced droughts to decrease available hydrop…
Not to mention some of it's hydropower is dirtier than coal in terms of methane & co2 produced. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7046-hydroelectric-po...
Re: Brazil Hits 92% Renewable Energy Milestone
#5Most of it is hydropower. But most good hydropower sites are already tapped, so we shouldn't expect this source growth to keep pace in the future. So, to keep these numbers good, it's necessary to crank up the deployment of solar panels and wind turbines a lot. Also solve the deforestation problem for good, otherwise Brazil will shoot its own feet by causing deforestation-induced droughts to decrease available hydrop…
Not to mention some of it's hydropower is dirtier than coal in terms of methane & co2 produced. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7046-hydroelectric-po...
Re: Brazil Hits 92% Renewable Energy Milestone
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not to mention some of it's hydropower is dirtier than coal in terms of methane & co2 produced. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7046-hydroelectric-po...
Uh, no. Nowhere in that article do they mention coal. Not do they do not do a comparison of hydro plant and fossil fuel plant emissions per megawatt-hour generated.
Re: Brazil Hits 92% Renewable Energy Milestone
#7Re: Brazil Hits 92% Renewable Energy Milestone
#8Most of it is hydropower. But most good hydropower sites are already tapped, so we shouldn't expect this source growth to keep pace in the future. So, to keep these numbers good, it's necessary to crank up the deployment of solar panels and wind turbines a lot. Also solve the deforestation problem for good, otherwise Brazil will shoot its own feet by causing deforestation-induced droughts to decrease available hydrop…
Not to mention some of it's hydropower is dirtier than coal in terms of methane & co2 produced. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7046-hydroelectric-po...
Re: Brazil Hits 92% Renewable Energy Milestone
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not to mention some of it's hydropower is dirtier than coal in terms of methane & co2 produced. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7046-hydroelectric-po...
Uh, no. Nowhere in that article do they mention coal. Not do they do not do a comparison of hydro plant and fossil fuel plant emissions per megawatt-hour generated.
"As a result of the methane released from its vast reservoir, proportional to its output, the Balbina Dam emits ten times more greenhouse gases than a coal plant."
Re: Brazil Hits 92% Renewable Energy Milestone
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not to mention some of it's hydropower is dirtier than coal in terms of methane & co2 produced. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7046-hydroelectric-po...
Isn't this just cycling carbon in ecosystem? Same as planting tree on 100 year scale is pointless... I would imagine that hydro is ~neutral on 100 year scale, while coal is not, since we introduce carbon into ecosystem. What am I missing?