Live data from Hacker News

Why You Should Be a Luddite

currentaffairs.org

1–10 of 41 posts

Re: Why You Should Be a Luddite

#4
If automation is the exploitation of workers by capitalists, then Luddism is the exploitation of consumers by workers. I don't want to be legally forced to pay double the price for clothing just because some well-connected weavers enacted regulation to ban more efficient competition.

Re: Why You Should Be a Luddite

#5
post #4

If automation is the exploitation of workers by capitalists, then Luddism is the exploitation of consumers by workers. I don't want to be legally forced to pay double the price for clothing just because some well-connected weavers enacted regulation to ban more efficient competition.

Because it's all about, and only about, you. Yes?

Re: Why You Should Be a Luddite

#6
post #4

If automation is the exploitation of workers by capitalists, then Luddism is the exploitation of consumers by workers. I don't want to be legally forced to pay double the price for clothing just because some well-connected weavers enacted regulation to ban more efficient competition.

Because it's all about, and only about, you. Yes?

> Because it's all about, and only about, you. Yes?

Yes, it is about the collective "you," and always has been.

To suggest otherwise is preposterous.

Re: Why You Should Be a Luddite

#8
post #4

If automation is the exploitation of workers by capitalists, then Luddism is the exploitation of consumers by workers. I don't want to be legally forced to pay double the price for clothing just because some well-connected weavers enacted regulation to ban more efficient competition.

Because it's all about, and only about, you. Yes?

Everyone is a consumer, it’s all of us.

It’s not just that you’re artificially keeping prices high, in a globalist world, someone else would do it and all the workers would lose their jobs.

Re: Why You Should Be a Luddite

#10
Should probably paste the second paragraph here for everyone who doesn’t wanna read TFA. Most people’s understanding of the Luddites seems about on par with their knowledge of the “idiot McDonalds coffee lady”

> The Luddites, Brian shows, weren’t anti-technology. In fact, they embraced new machines that helped them do their jobs better. They were against machines that destroyed workers’ livelihoods and rendered their skills useless. The Luddites rejected technology when it was used to enrich capitalists at the expense of laborers. Their dispute is best understood not as being over “technology” but about who gets the benefit of new technologies and who decides what kinds of technologies will be implemented

Post reply on HN