Ruby 3.3 on Rails 1.0
nashby.github.io
Ruby 3.3 on Rails 1.0
1–10 of 76 posts
Re: Ruby 3.3 on Rails 1.0
#2That was a fun read. You should do Rails 8.0 on Ruby 1.8 next.
Re: Ruby 3.3 on Rails 1.0
#3If the author reads this, I think you shouldn't bind space to the side menu, I (hope) many people know you can scroll with space.
Re: Ruby 3.3 on Rails 1.0
#4If the author reads this, I think you shouldn't bind space to the side menu, I (hope) many people know you can scroll with space.
I don't know if they fixed it really quickly, but space does the normal scrolling for me, on Chrome and Safari.
Re: Ruby 3.3 on Rails 1.0
#5If the author reads this, I think you shouldn't bind space to the side menu, I (hope) many people know you can scroll with space.
I dont experience that. Perhaps you pressed tab once beforehand to focus the menu?
Re: Ruby 3.3 on Rails 1.0
#6Re: Ruby 3.3 on Rails 1.0
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
I dont experience that. Perhaps you pressed tab once beforehand to focus the menu?
ah, yes, but since there's no focus indicator it's not obvious
Looks like it has a focus indicator to me, although I can see why it might be confusing: https://imgur.com/a/Mc6A7Dn
Re: Ruby 3.3 on Rails 1.0
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
ah, yes, but since there's no focus indicator it's not obvious
Looks like it has a focus indicator to me, although I can see why it might be confusing: https://imgur.com/a/Mc6A7Dn
Yeah, I guess I pressed tab right away and thought it was the design of the button.
I think it's better to keep the focus style as the default outline, and uniform.
Re: Ruby 3.3 on Rails 1.0
#9Regression testing.
It'd be a nice regression test to have:
- Rails pegged at a particular version number and test the runtimes.
- Ruby runtime pegged at a particular version and test Rails versions
Re: Ruby 3.3 on Rails 1.0
#10As much as people complain about Python, Ruby really went through just as much (if not more) churn over the years from backwards-incompatible changes.