Is htmx Just Another JavaScript Framework?
1–10 of 318 posts
Re: Is htmx Just Another JavaScript Framework?
#2Re: Is htmx Just Another JavaScript Framework?
#3Re: Is htmx Just Another JavaScript Framework?
#4no
Re: Is htmx Just Another JavaScript Framework?
#5Re: Is htmx Just Another JavaScript Framework?
#6The sweet spot for HTMX I've found involves liberally using the hx-boost attribute enhance links and forms that already work without JavaScript. You definitely sacrifice some of the expressivity of HTMX, but you also get a website that is much less coupled to the (library|framework).
Re: Is htmx Just Another JavaScript Framework?
#7no
Re: Is htmx Just Another JavaScript Framework?
#8>React - The library for web and native user interfaces
https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/126uzfo/why_is_rea...
https://medium.com/@Angie.O/why-react-is-a-library-and-not-a...
https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/what-react-is/978149199...
Re: Is htmx Just Another JavaScript Framework?
#9https://blog.jim-nielsen.com/2023/html-web-components/
I don't really understand why people would bother arguing whether htmx is a library or a framework. It's a way of making a web site where you write less JS.
Re: Is htmx Just Another JavaScript Framework?
#10But the concept is totally different. It uses a hypermedia declarative model, an extended POST/GET etc. model. It keeps things very simple compared to a framework like React where you need a package manager, a transpiler and a json backend for data (not returning hypermedia).
So I would not consider it another Javascript frontend framework at all. I would consider it more like original html with extensions that support Ajax respecting the original web model.