Adobe & HTML

#1

Post by v33ra » Mon, Apr 23, 2012, 5:03 AM UTC

Adobe & HTML
html.adobe.com

Re: Adobe & HTML

#2

Post by tommi » Mon, Apr 23, 2012, 6:09 AM UTC

Sad how the samples don't have any working fallback but break hideously on Chrome 19.

Re: Adobe & HTML

#3

Post by RossM » Mon, Apr 23, 2012, 6:17 AM UTC

On the Tools and Services page, this piqued my interest:

> Code

> We think there’s a need for a different type of code editor – we’re working on something and will have more to share soon.

Re: Adobe & HTML

#4

Post by james4k » Mon, Apr 23, 2012, 6:28 AM UTC

Wow! At first I thought Adobe had jumped into the browser market. That would be interesting.

Re: Adobe & HTML

#5

Post by Zr40 » Mon, Apr 23, 2012, 6:32 AM UTC

tommi wrote: post #2

Sad how the samples don't have any working fallback but break hideously on Chrome 19.

They're working fine for me in Chrome 18 and Webkit nightly, though not in Safari 5.1.5.

Re: Adobe & HTML

#6

Post by bonjourmr » Mon, Apr 23, 2012, 6:46 AM UTC

RossM wrote: post #3

On the Tools and Services page, this piqued my interest: > Code > We think there’s a need for a different type of code editor – we’re working on something and will have more to share soon.

But what's wrong with Dreamweaver? /s

Re: Adobe & HTML

#7

Post by tommi » Mon, Apr 23, 2012, 6:46 AM UTC

Zr40 wrote: post #5

tommi wrote: post #2

Sad how the samples don't have any working fallback but break hideously on Chrome 19.

They're working fine for me in Chrome 18 and Webkit nightly, though not in Safari 5.1.5.

Yes, but are you using the experimental --enable-css-regions switch?

Re: Adobe & HTML

#8

Post by sparknlaunch12 » Mon, Apr 23, 2012, 6:48 AM UTC

They lost on flash. Will they lose on html and CSS?

Re: Adobe & HTML

#9

Post by pdenya » Mon, Apr 23, 2012, 6:50 AM UTC

RossM wrote: post #3

On the Tools and Services page, this piqued my interest: > Code > We think there’s a need for a different type of code editor – we’re working on something and will have more to share soon.

Same, but I've never used an adobe product thats fast, responsive, and made for power users. I don't want another editor that's trying to hold my hand like dreamweaver.

Re: Adobe & HTML

#10

Post by artursapek » Mon, Apr 23, 2012, 7:03 AM UTC

bonjourmr wrote: post #6

RossM wrote: post #3

On the Tools and Services page, this piqued my interest: > Code > We think there’s a need for a different type of code editor – we’re working on something and will have more to share soon.

But what's wrong with Dreamweaver? /s

Joking aside, Dreamweaver got me into HTML and CSS six years ago when I was 13 and now I have a pretty awesome job developing. Like pdenya states, it's definitely not for power users. But it has its place.