Commission opens formal proceedings against X under the Digital Services Act
1–10 of 141 posts
Re: Commission opens formal proceedings against X under the Digital Services Act
#2Re: Commission opens formal proceedings against X under the Digital Services Act
#3Re: Commission opens formal proceedings against X under the Digital Services Act
#4[flagged]
Re: Commission opens formal proceedings against X under the Digital Services Act
#5Re: Commission opens formal proceedings against X under the Digital Services Act
#6Re: Commission opens formal proceedings against X under the Digital Services Act
#7Re: Commission opens formal proceedings against X under the Digital Services Act
#8But the big problem for X is that Musk burned so many bridges with fired employees that the list of whistleblowers for any issues will be endless.
Re: Commission opens formal proceedings against X under the Digital Services Act
#9Re: Commission opens formal proceedings against X under the Digital Services Act
#10I’m curious if X will manage to build up the moderation tools and automation without rehiring as many moderators as they used to have. Looking at the requirements, some of those challenging - preventing fast dissemination of illegal content.
I can't find an English source here and the original is paywalled, but from a German article (https://www.heise.de/news/Leak-Leugnung-des-Holocaust-und-me...) summarizing the original reporting comes the following example of a tweet that is allegedly allowed now:
> Next stop on our tour across Poland is Auschwitz. For Jews this is the last stop, please exit and take your luggage with you.
It also mentions that threats of physical are no longer a reason for suspending accounts.