Mathematicians have found a new upper limit to the Ramsey number
quantamagazine.org
Mathematicians have found a new upper limit to the Ramsey number
1–10 of 46 posts
Re: Mathematicians have found a new upper limit to the Ramsey number
#2I submitted this link 1 day ago, but I am not sure why it's on the front page now, as it says I posted it just 1 hour ago
Re: Mathematicians have found a new upper limit to the Ramsey number
#3I submitted this link 1 day ago, but I am not sure why it's on the front page now, as it says I posted it just 1 hour ago https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=georgehill
[deleted]
Re: Mathematicians have found a new upper limit to the Ramsey number
#4I submitted this link 1 day ago, but I am not sure why it's on the front page now, as it says I posted it just 1 hour ago https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=georgehill
Moderators often resubmit submissions with fake time. (I pretty much hate this. I don't like people lying things about me, like I was using HN at a time I wasn't. Be aware of this.)
Re: Mathematicians have found a new upper limit to the Ramsey number
#5I submitted this link 1 day ago, but I am not sure why it's on the front page now, as it says I posted it just 1 hour ago https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=georgehill
dang explains the mechanics behind the second-chance pool here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26998308
Regarding timestamp inconsistencies: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19774614
Re: Mathematicians have found a new upper limit to the Ramsey number
#6I submitted this link 1 day ago, but I am not sure why it's on the front page now, as it says I posted it just 1 hour ago https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=georgehill
dang explains the mechanics behind the second-chance pool here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26998308 Regarding timestamp inconsistencies: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19774614
Wow, this is super cool! Thanks!
Re: Mathematicians have found a new upper limit to the Ramsey number
#7I submitted this link 1 day ago, but I am not sure why it's on the front page now, as it says I posted it just 1 hour ago https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=georgehill
Moderators often resubmit submissions with fake time. (I pretty much hate this. I don't like people lying things about me, like I was using HN at a time I wasn't. Be aware of this.)
Why?
Re: Mathematicians have found a new upper limit to the Ramsey number
#8> Can we improve 3.993 to 3.9? Maybe to 3.4? And what about 3?”
Pi is feeling a little left out. If that turns out to be the true asymptotic behavior of Ramsey numbers, it would make one of the worst ever methods for computing digits of pi...
Re: Mathematicians have found a new upper limit to the Ramsey number
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Moderators often resubmit submissions with fake time. (I pretty much hate this. I don't like people lying things about me, like I was using HN at a time I wasn't. Be aware of this.)
Why?
It's an invasion of privacy. Imagine that a post appears under your name with a date/time where you are supposed to be working. If you are paid by somebody else, this may get you into trouble, or even fired.
Re: Mathematicians have found a new upper limit to the Ramsey number
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why?
It's an invasion of privacy. Imagine that a post appears under your name with a date/time where you are supposed to be working. If you are paid by somebody else, this may get you into trouble, or even fired.
In fairness in such an extreme situation it seems likely there would be a conversation where you'd have the opportunity to explain.
If there weren't, well, probably you're better off?