Live data from Hacker News

Rust std fs slower than Python? No, it's hardware

xuanwo.io

1–10 of 255 posts

Re: Rust std fs slower than Python? No, it's hardware

#5
post #3

Either the author changed the headline to something less clickbaity in the meantime or you edited it for clickbait Pop_- (in that case: shame on you) - current headline: "Rust std fs slower than Python!? No, it's hardware!"

Based on the /r/rust thread, the author seemed to change the headline based on feedback to make it less clickbait-y

Re: Rust std fs slower than Python? No, it's hardware

#6
post #3

Either the author changed the headline to something less clickbaity in the meantime or you edited it for clickbait Pop_- (in that case: shame on you) - current headline: "Rust std fs slower than Python!? No, it's hardware!"

Sorry for the clickbaity title, I have changed it based on others advice.

Re: Rust std fs slower than Python? No, it's hardware

#7
post #3

Either the author changed the headline to something less clickbaity in the meantime or you edited it for clickbait Pop_- (in that case: shame on you) - current headline: "Rust std fs slower than Python!? No, it's hardware!"

The author has updated the title and also contacted me. But unfortunately I'm no longer able to update it so.
Post reply on HN