Google wins reprieve from $32M verdict in Sonos patent fight
1–10 of 54 posts
Re: Google wins reprieve from $32M verdict in Sonos patent fight
#2Re: Google wins reprieve from $32M verdict in Sonos patent fight
#3Re: Google wins reprieve from $32M verdict in Sonos patent fight
#4I am used to seeing statements that these legal cases cost $$$$ in legal fees, so I am curious what is likely to have been the spend on either side of the case. A $32.5 million verdict is likely significantly lower than Sonos had hoped. What was that likely to have been as a ratio of legal fees? Would Google have hired outside consul to help defend or is the in house staff sufficient to handle the case?
Re: Google wins reprieve from $32M verdict in Sonos patent fight
#5Alsup strikes again! Same judge who presided over Oracle v Google, and Google v Uber/Levandowski.
Re: Google wins reprieve from $32M verdict in Sonos patent fight
#6Alsup strikes again! Same judge who presided over Oracle v Google, and Google v Uber/Levandowski.
So refreshing to see some semblance of sanity in these cases...
(Okay, not technically relevant, but it is an amazing coincidence. He does have a programming hobby, albeit not using the Haskell language.)
Re: Google wins reprieve from $32M verdict in Sonos patent fight
#7Alsup strikes again! Same judge who presided over Oracle v Google, and Google v Uber/Levandowski.
Re: Google wins reprieve from $32M verdict in Sonos patent fight
#8Re: Google wins reprieve from $32M verdict in Sonos patent fight
#9I rather hope they restore the original functionality for Google home they had to throw out thanks to this case.
git revert revert-me-if-sonos-tossed