Live data from Hacker News

Alameda lost tens of millions because of a fat fingering mistake

adityabaradwaj.com

1–10 of 197 posts

Re: Alameda lost tens of millions because of a fat fingering mistake

#5
"the utility we gained by moving fast outweighed the occasional costs we paid due to poor risk checks, hacks, and the like"

I think this may have potentially been true when everything was going up volume-wise, but as competition improves there's less margin for error.

Re: Alameda lost tens of millions because of a fat fingering mistake

#9

"the utility we gained by moving fast outweighed the occasional costs we paid due to poor risk checks, hacks, and the like" I think this may have potentially been true when everything was going up volume-wise, but as competition improves there's less margin for error.

it's not about the number of mistakes but the size of the mistake

Re: Alameda lost tens of millions because of a fat fingering mistake

#10
> According to SBF, the utility we gained by moving fast outweighed the occasional costs we paid due to poor risk checks, hacks, and the like. This was SBF's work philosophy, and it drove the culture he created at Alameda and FTX.

Moving fast is great, but you need structure to support it. If you front load your development with guard rails that ensure you're always on track, then you "aim small, miss small" so to speak. If you do none of that and just hope that you can respond to problems as they arise then you've really not aimed at all and can potentially hit a target, but likely also hit a house.

Post reply on HN